[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bigger annoyance with locking.
From: |
Dan Mahoney, System Admin |
Subject: |
Bigger annoyance with locking. |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:17:19 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) |
I am on a system at work where all our passwords are kerberized, and the
password field in my account is "*" Thus, when locking screen, it asks
for a key.
Now, interestingly enough, it would be rather trivial for a locked screen
to use its internal locking tool, and just use the password I've set in my
.screenrc, but it's "hard" to pass a crypted password to the non-builtin.
It can prompt twice for a non-crypted password, but that really defeats
idle-locking.
According to the manpage, screen calls /bin/lock or whatnot -- there's no
way through .screenrc to change this (why?)...and yet the output of a
locked screen looks significantly different from when I use lock alone.
Any ideas on this one?
-Dan
--
I want to see how you see.
-SK, 6/2/99, 4:30 AM
--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------
- Bigger annoyance with locking.,
Dan Mahoney, System Admin <=
- Re: Bigger annoyance with locking., Micah Cowan, 2008/11/13
- Re: Bigger annoyance with locking., Trent W. Buck, 2008/11/13
- Re: Bigger annoyance with locking., Dan Mahoney, System Admin, 2008/11/13
- Re: Bigger annoyance with locking., Micah Cowan, 2008/11/13
- Re: Bigger annoyance with locking., Dan Mahoney, System Admin, 2008/11/13
- Re: Bigger annoyance with locking., Trent W. Buck, 2008/11/13
- Re: Bigger annoyance with locking., Dan Mahoney, System Admin, 2008/11/13
- Re: Bigger annoyance with locking., Trent W. Buck, 2008/11/13