[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm
From: |
Sadrul Habib Chowdhury |
Subject: |
Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:53:02 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* A S had this to say on [05 Dec 2009, 19:41:53 +0100]:
> Hi,
> I do wonder why gnu screen is so slow in vertical split while dvtm
> http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/ does not exhibit any visible
> slowdown?
> Is it because screen emulates vt100 only?
It's because screen tries to refresh the display an aweful lot of time. I
have a sort of a hacky fix for this at the moment. A nicer fix looks to
be non-trivial. But I will try to get to it in a day or two. If I can't
get to it, I will probably check in the sorta-hacky fix (do feel free to
nudge me if I don't!)
Cheers,
Sadrul
- screen vertical split speed vs dvtm, A S, 2009/12/07
- Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm, A S, 2009/12/07
- Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm,
Sadrul Habib Chowdhury <=
- Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury, 2009/12/07
- Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm, Chris Jones, 2009/12/08
- Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury, 2009/12/08
- Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm, Chris Jones, 2009/12/08
- Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm, Chris Jones, 2009/12/24
- Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury, 2009/12/24
- Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm, Chris Jones, 2009/12/25
- Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury, 2009/12/25
- Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm, Chris Jones, 2009/12/25
- Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm, Andrew Schulman, 2009/12/26