Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem

[E. Weddington]

Paul Schlie wrote:

> > From: Bill <address@hidden>
> > Basically, it is(was) a real problem to keep the generated files up to
> > date. They are generated, and as a general principal, generated files
> > don't belong under revision control. It's my opinion that in general the
> > "tarballs" are intended for end-users, not CVS. Making CVS provided
> > files easy to use is a great goal, but I know that we fall short of it.
> >    
>
> Although I understand that maintaining correct configure/etc. updates in
> CVS adds some burden, however note that it's standard practice for all
> GNU projects that I'm aware of; 
Paul, you asked about this in avr-libc, and you got the same response.

In theory getting and running the correct version of the autotools 
hasn't been a big deal.