[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem
From: |
Klaus Rudolph |
Subject: |
Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:09:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040114 |
Hi all,
we have taken the actual decision to leave the generated files from cvs
while each "developer" has to use
actual tools. The cvs content (HEAD) is normaly only interisting for
developers.
"Pure Users" should take the last "stable" tar ball. This tarballs
should compile with
configure/make/make install.
So I would not have any generated files in such a small project at all.
As I know for my last works
in binutils I had the effect that I changed generated files and must do
the work a second time. The only
reason for this was that the files were contained in cvs.
If you speak over big and complicated tools which are not simple to
install we should go another way. But actually
we have simple tools and a very small project.
My decision for this is that the project setup is ok for developers and
the tarballs should work for most users.
If there are "developers" which need support for tool setup, feel free
to ask your questions here.
If we change our setup in cvs we have to ask a lot more questions:
There are intermediate tools in it like keytabgen which builds a header
and a c file from a data file for keyboard
simulations. Is this also a tool which must be putted under cvs? What is
with libraries which are build for intermediate
programs?
My opinion: The actual structure enable all developers to work. The
actual tgz files enable all users to use simulavrxx.
Bye
Klaus
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem, (continued)
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem, Paul Schlie, 2005/01/28
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem, Bill, 2005/01/28
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem, Paul Schlie, 2005/01/28
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem, Bill, 2005/01/28
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem, Paul Schlie, 2005/01/29
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem, Bill, 2005/01/29
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem, Galen Seitz, 2005/01/29
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem, Bill, 2005/01/29
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem, Paul Schlie, 2005/01/29
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem, Bill, 2005/01/29
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem,
Klaus Rudolph <=
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] SimulAVR Compilation Problem, E. Weddington, 2005/01/29