[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR
From: |
robots.txt fan |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Apr 2018 11:08:59 -0400 |
Moritz Wirth wrote:
> Given the fact that it is not possible to delete data from a keyserver
Of course this is possible. You can delete key by using the "sks drop <hash>"
command. Now, if I understand it correctly the key will immediately be re-added
because of gossiping keyservers. However, it would not be impossible to extend
SKS to have a keyserver reject keys from a blacklist that each server admin
would maintain, or possibly gossip. (If this does not exist already.)
I imagine this would be a useful instrument for more use-cases than this one. I
imagine a server admin based in Germany would get in trouble if someone
submitted a key with the user-id "The owner of this server denies the
Holocaust", an action that is illegal in Germany. The server admin could get
out of the trouble by adding the hash of that key to the blacklist.
I know I am suggesting censorship but it's not like SKS was ever meant to be a
secure or reliable channel.
- [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR, Fabian A. Santiago, 2018/04/29
- Re: [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR, Moritz Wirth, 2018/04/29
- Re: [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR, chris, 2018/04/29
- Re: [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR, Klaus-Uwe Mitterer, 2018/04/29
- Re: [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR,
robots.txt fan <=
- Re: [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR, Moritz Wirth, 2018/04/29
- Re: [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR, Ari Trachtenberg, 2018/04/29
- Re: [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR, H Visage, 2018/04/29
- Re: [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR, Andrew Gallagher, 2018/04/30
- Re: [Sks-devel] Implications of GDPR, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2018/04/30