Re: [Social-discuss] Interoperability?

[Ted Smith]

On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 16:51 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> >       * Since then very little discussion on this topic has happened, on
> >         this list or on address@hidden (in fact, that list has about two
> >         threads IIRC).
> 
> this is the first i'm hearing of address@hidden  can you explain the
> difference between that list and this one?  why is that list not listed
> on the wiki?
> 
I'm not sure, to be honest. Maybe Matt Lee someone else in the upper
echelons of GNU Social could respond?

> > People need to speak up about this protocol we're supposedly developing,
> > otherwise this project will rapidly lose relevance and die. Someone
> > might do what we're trying to do now, but I'd rather not leave that up
> > to chance. 
> 
> Yes, agreed!  Perhaps a small number of framing questions would be
> useful to get the discussion going?

As they say in every IRC guide, don't ask to ask, just ask...

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part