Re: [Social-discuss] distributed social networks

[marc]

On 2018-01-20 13:31, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> On 20 January 2018 at 13:20, marc <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > quoting carlo freely, probably messily =)
> >
> > > Teddks was the man who convinced
> > > me that federation was a dead horse. Now we are dealing
> > > with dead elephants as an alternative to it. Progress!
> > > (...)
> > > How can anything that goes onto the blockchain scale up?
> >
> > Well, i don't know, that was why i was asking.. since are very
> > visible developed techs,
> > perhaps holochain, and that mike s miller approach bring something
> > new there. idk.
>
> No block chains typically cant scale up, at least not efficiently.
> This is why layer 2+ is useful.  Or using the a distributed web
> strategy.

so, let me some "adventured" thinking on this...

beyond the strategic arbitrary diferentiating of more static content 
(which looks useful to harden it in a blockchain maybe) from more 
dyanmic content (that could be used within some lighter p2p thing) which 
could be polemic but it wont be that much in the end...

would it be posible to develop a profiler client, (let's say uport as a 
blockchained example), where from could i add further blockchained 
bundles (such as aragon simple contracts maker) along with some other 
p2p apps for other types of contents?

i mean... which kind of "core" app, or scratch spec, could do best as a 
kind of the synaptic package manager does but for p2p social networking 
features?

i am just dying for a p2p basic profiler than could integrate and scale 
up features up to a groupier fakebook for example.. i was expecting 
uport to be able to do it, and i am guessing now that it is not a good 
base at all for that.. but.... idk... ;)


> Happy new year all! :)

:)