[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug...
From: |
Shawn Betts |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug... |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:58:48 -0800 |
> (Side note: I'm not really sure what the practical difference between
> :abort and :message is. :abort throws out of the main loop whereas
> :message just continues; so I guess the idea is that :abort ensures
> you're in a stable state at the cost of a soft reset, whereas :message
> leaves everything as it is, risking something somewhere being broken).
I think :message may be old crust from how errors used to be handled.
It's possible one could simply want to display a message and push
through but I suspect that's almost always a bad idea.
-Shawn
- Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug..., (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug..., Ben Spencer, 2010/01/21
- Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug..., Brit Butler, 2010/01/21
- Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug..., Ben Spencer, 2010/01/21
- Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug..., Brit Butler, 2010/01/22
- Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug..., Ben Spencer, 2010/01/23
- Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug..., Brit Butler, 2010/01/23
- Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug..., Ben Spencer, 2010/01/23
- Message not available
- Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug..., Brit Butler, 2010/01/27
- Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug..., Julian Stecklina, 2010/01/31
- Message not available
- Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug..., Ben Spencer, 2010/01/31
- Re: [STUMP] Interesting Bug...,
Shawn Betts <=