[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:16:17 +0200 (MET DST) |
> I will probably rewrite it better and send it tomorrow. Let me say
> that symbolic defined in enums are follow no consistant convention and
> that all upper case suck big time. I can fix it with a Perl script.
> Similar remarks for class names.
I have been looking to the patch in more detail.
I am not sure that it would really be a good thing to apply it,
because many of the #define's are really definitions of constants
or masks and *not* new litterals in some new enumeration class.
In fact the latter case only occurs a few times and
I am not sure about making a specific modification for this.
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch,
Joris van der Hoeven <=
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Stéphane Payrard, 2002/09/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Stéphane Payrard, 2002/09/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/09/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Stéphane Payrard, 2002/09/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/09/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Stéphane Payrard, 2002/09/13
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/09/13
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Stéphane Payrard, 2002/09/13
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/09/13
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] enums patch, Stéphane Payrard, 2002/09/14