[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Explanation for patch #2590
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] Explanation for patch #2590 |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:27:03 +0100 (CET) |
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Nix N. Nix wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 14:57, Joris van der Hoeven wrote:
> > At the moment, the "para" has not been implemented yet though,
> > some things have to be hacked.
>
> OK, I see. So, "para" will no longer refer to header/footer-type stuff.
> However, until that happens, the gluing code breaks the LaTeX
> translation.
>
> To remind ourselves that, eventually, we should have the gluing code,
> but not until the incoming tree is in the format you mentioned, we
> should comment out the 4 lines in tmpre.scm I mentioned earlier in the
> thread (in the message that has the attachment).
>
> Then, when we have the "para" stuff in the TeXmacs tree, we can work on
> properly translating it.
I fixed the problem myself.
- [Texmacs-dev] Explanation for patch #2590, Nix, 2004/02/09
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Explanation for patch #2590, David Allouche, 2004/02/11
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Explanation for patch #2590, Nix, 2004/02/11
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Explanation for patch #2590, David Allouche, 2004/02/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Explanation for patch #2590, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/02/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Explanation for patch #2590, Nix, 2004/02/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Explanation for patch #2590, Joris van der Hoeven, 2004/02/15
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Explanation for patch #2590, Nix N. Nix, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Explanation for patch #2590,
Joris van der Hoeven <=