[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Texmacs-dev] Efficiency of scheme implementation
From: |
Joris van der Hoeven |
Subject: |
[Texmacs-dev] Efficiency of scheme implementation |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:05:57 +0100 (CET) |
Hi *,
I have been benchmarking a few Scheme implementations.
I used the computation of Fibonacci numbers as a benchmark:
(define (fib n) (if (< n 2) 1 (+ (fib (- n 1)) (fib (- n 2)))))
Here are some (approximate) timings for (fib 35):
Guile 37 sec
Scheme 48 17 sec
MzScheme 8 sec
Whenever we have time to implement another Scheme backend,
it thus seems that MzScheme remains the best choice.
Maybe someone knows of some more classical benchmarks for
Scheme implementations?
Best wishes, Joris
- [Texmacs-dev] Efficiency of scheme implementation,
Joris van der Hoeven <=