Re: [Tinycc-devel] Addresses of variables

[Timo]

Alexei wrote:
> Isn't it a BUG?
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
>   int first;
>   int second;
>   printf("&first=%08X &second=%08X",&first,&second);
>   return 0;
> }
> ---------------------------------
> &first=0012FF94 &second=0012FF90

What exactly do you think is a bug? If you think, that it is a bug to 
allocate variable 'first' in a higher address than the variable 
'second', you are wrong. Compiler is free to allocate variables as it 
wishes. Actually it would have been free *not* to allocate them at all 
if you didn't take the addresses of them.

--

Timo