Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bashisms in configure and gcctestsuite

[Thomas Preud'homme]

Le mercredi 23 juin 2010 15:28:09, grischka a écrit :
> Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> >> What was the problem with using just conftest.x as suggested?
> > 
> > Compared to the $RANDOM approach this solution is far less random.
> 
> And what is the problem with less random?
I don't know but I thought if there was 2 random parts before there must have 
been some conflict reason which occured in the past.
> 
> Otherwise I'd suggest to waste time with more useful things, such as
> a rewrite of tccgen.c or of the macro preprocessor or an interface
> with other code generators such as TCG or LLVM ;)
Or rewind code which would allow tcc to compile statically, I got the message 
:)
> 
> --- grischka

Thomas Preud'homme

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.