Re: [Tinycc-devel] Using clang

[Thomas Preud'homme]

Le vendredi 15 février 2013 13:39:57, grischka a écrit :
> You wrote:
> > fixed pasto in in 108b2876; background for the additional $CC test is:
> > GCC_MAJOR may be set even is $CC not realy gcc (but i.e. clang, which (as
> > of 3.1) requires an addtional CFLAG to accept the non portable (gnuisms
> > all over the place; try to cimpile tcc with Sun^HOracle, Intel,
> > Pathscale, ... compiler) code).
> 
> Using "-fheinous-gnu-extensions" for clang makes sense but I still
> don't see how "GCC_MAJOR may be set even is $CC not realy gcc"???

I suppose like for tinycc, lots of code out there test GCC_MAJOR and GCC_MINOR 
for available features so other compilers with good compatibility with gcc 
have no choice but to pretend to be gcc.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --- grischka

Best regards,

Thomas

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.