Re: [Tinycc-devel] Annoying new warning

[William Hales]

> > Hopefully this email will not suffer the same problem.  Vincent: what mail
> > client are you using?
> Mutt. I choose to display the text/plain part by default (thus not
> needing an HTML parser, with potential security issues).

Gah, sorry.  I meant to ask Christian: what client are you using?

Regards, Hales



Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2017-05-05 17:29:22 +1000, William Hales wrote:
> > This is his message, copied and pasted:
> >
> > > Hi Vincent,
> > >
> > > return 666; works equally well as it should not be called by ARM backend.
> > >
> > > This is a workaround to remove warning.
> But this can hide bugs, e.g. if in the future this function is called
> by the ARM backend. It would be better either not to define this
> function at all (best solution at it doesn't make sense on the ARM,
> and issues would be detected at compile time) or have something like
> an assert to abort if this function is called.
>
> > Hopefully this email will not suffer the same problem.  Vincent: what mail
> > client are you using?
> Mutt. I choose to display the text/plain part by default (thus not
> needing an HTML parser, with potential security issues).