grischka -
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 05:44:28PM +0200, grischka wrote:
If people are going to use clang more likely, can't you add something
to configure for clang to turn off some silly warnings?
That would be USEFUL, for example ;)
The clang flag to turn off this warning is -Wno-string-plus-int
That brings up another issue, which is that tinycc's cute little
configure script that figures out which warning (or lack of warning)
flags are compatible with $CC doesn't work with clang.
I have no opinion on whether adding the nice plural to two tinycc
messages is worth the extra space and time. I don't think that
((i > 1) ? "s" : "") is a good choice. Any of "s" + (i<2),
&"s"[i<2], and just a universal plural "symbols" (like it was
before 2d3b9559 from Feb 2017) is fine with me.
This is a lot of discussion for two lines of code. I guess that's
mostly my fault, too.
- Larry