[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Traverso-devel] Routing concept
From: |
Jonatan Liljedahl |
Subject: |
Re: [Traverso-devel] Routing concept |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:13:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051025) |
Nicola Döbelin wrote:
...
> I think AUX busses could easily be derived from tracks, as they are basically
> stripped down tracks. Maybe you could add a flag to the track object,
> something like 'is_aux_bus=true', and in case of 'true', disable some
> features. I'll try to list some of them, but there may be more:
>
> - hide the record button / skip all recording-relevant code
> - don't add AUX send ports / skip all AUX *send*-relevant code
> - don't allow to connect anything to the input in the patch bay dialog
> - instead connect all corresponding AUX send ports of all tracks to the input
> (- lock the track view so as not to be able to move audio clips onto the AUX
> track)
I really think one should be able to send one AUX to *another* AUX. I
often do that on my analogue mixing desk!
Also, I always use real channels for aux returns, just so that I can
send it to other aux'es and use the onboard EQ and such... For me,
effects are just another soundsource as anything else on the desk, and I
want the same control for them.
/Jonatan