weechat-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Weechat-dev] [task #11351] allow buffer names for irc.msgbuffer


From: Filip H.F.
Subject: [Weechat-dev] [task #11351] allow buffer names for irc.msgbuffer
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 23:22:15 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/14.0.835.35 Safari/535.1

URL:
  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?11351>

                 Summary: allow buffer names for irc.msgbuffer
                 Project: WeeChat
            Submitted by: fixato
            Submitted on: Sun 11 Sep 2011 23:22:14 GMT
                Category: irc plugin
         Should Start On: Sun 11 Sep 2011 00:00:00 GMT
   Should be Finished on: Sun 11 Sep 2011 00:00:00 GMT
                Priority: 5 - Normal
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
        Percent Complete: 0%
             Assigned to: None
         Originator Name: 
        Originator Email: 
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
         Planned Release: None
                IRC nick: FiXato

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

Currently irc.msgbuffer.* (and fallback) only support weechat, server, current
and private as options.
Ideally I would like to be able to specify any buffer name (as a string),
including non-existing buffer names (in which case a new buffer by that name
would be created).

Example:
I would like to be able to have a separate buffer that just has all notices.
It would be awesome if I could do:
++++
/set irc.msgbuffer.notice "notices"
----
And when a notice would arrive, WeeChat would create a new buffer on the fly
by the name "notices" (should it not exist) and show the notice in that
window.

The current (integer) options should remain possible so you can still have
notices show up in a private buffer, or the originating server buffer for
instance, but the ability to add (string) buffer names would make the current
system a lot more flexible.

If creating new buffers on the fly is too much hassle, offering an
interface/command to create new buffers manually (i.e. /buffer -create
"notices") would also work.




    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?11351>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]