[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy eldred-amicus.html

From: Joakim Olsson
Subject: www/philosophy eldred-amicus.html
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:58:53 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Joakim Olsson <jocke>   07/03/23 20:58:53

Modified files:
        philosophy     : eldred-amicus.html 

Log message:
        Fixed invalid HTML.


Index: eldred-amicus.html
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/eldred-amicus.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- eldred-amicus.html  21 Apr 2006 16:23:49 -0000      1.8
+++ eldred-amicus.html  23 Mar 2007 20:58:38 -0000      1.9
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
 <!--Converted with LaTeX2HTML 99.2beta6 (1.42)
 original version by:  Nikos Drakos, CBLU, University of Leeds
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 <TITLE>FSF's Brief Amicus Curiae, Eldred v. Ashcroft</TITLE>
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
 <META HTTP-EQUIV="Keywords"
  CONTENT="GNU, FSF, Free Software Foundation, GNU, Linux, freedom, software, 
power, rights, copyright, extension, opinion, eldred, ashcroft, mickey mouse, 
law, disney, sonny bono, retroactive, perpetual">
 <META HTTP-EQUIV="Description" CONTENT="">
@@ -23,6 +24,7 @@
 <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="LaTeX2HTML v99.2beta6">
 <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Style-Type" CONTENT="text/css">
+<STYLE type="text/css">
 H1 { text-align: center; 
      color: rgb(8,0,24);
@@ -872,21 +874,21 @@
-<P><A NAME="foot151"
+<dd><A NAME="foot151"
  HREF="#tex2html1"><sup>1</sup>&nbsp;&nbsp;</A>Counsel for both parties have 
consented to the
 filing of this brief, and those consents have been filed with the
 Clerk of this Court.  No counsel for either party had any role in
 authoring this brief, and no person other than the <I>amicus</I> and
 its counsel made any monetary contribution to its preparation and
-<P><A NAME="foot152"
+<dd><A NAME="foot152"
  HREF="#tex2html2"><sup>2</sup>&nbsp;&nbsp;</A>The only amendment made was in 
the replacement of the
 phrase originally suggested by Charles Pinckney of South Carolina,
 that monopolies be granted for a ``certain'' time.  <I>See</I> 3
-<I>id.</I>, at 122.
+<I>id.</I>, at 122.</dd>
-<P><A NAME="foot138"
+<dd><A NAME="foot138"
  HREF="#tex2html3"><sup>3</sup>&nbsp;&nbsp;</A>The Court
 of Appeals minimized the importance of the impoverishment of the
 public domain when it maintained that ``[p]reserving access to works
@@ -900,7 +902,7 @@
 copyright monopolies conflicts with the constitutionally mandated
 requirement of originality: Congress cannot elect to preserve books,
 films, or music by conveying to the conservator a statutory monopoly
-of copying and distribution lasting decades.
+of copying and distribution lasting decades.</dd>
@@ -936,7 +938,7 @@
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2006/04/21 16:23:49 $ $Author: taz $
+$Date: 2007/03/23 20:58:38 $ $Author: jocke $
 <!-- timestamp end -->

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]