|
From: | Tessa Hatfield |
Subject: | [Chinese-authors] I nut |
Date: | Fri, 1 Sep 2006 16:41:34 -0400 |
L, myfellow-medium, had never seen a ouija board
until one evening he came bychance to my house. These statements were,to say the
least of it, astonishing.
For cryptesthesia is practically what we usedto
call clairvoyance. A sheet of plate glass islaid over the table and the
letters.
If so, I have absolutely no recollectionof the
fact. Wilde answered: Achaotic confusion of fluid nebulosities, a cloaque of
souls.
Satisfactory conditions chiefly consist in
freedomfrom distraction of any kind whatever. A hint of any intention ofthe kind was
evidently unwelcome.
He wished to continue theautomatic
writing.
I have already disposed of the idea that
Mr.
Strangely enough, some weeks later I saw in The
Timesa notice of a sale of Oscar Wildes letters.
I felt it rather difficult and dangerous ground to
ask about Wildesprison experience. That fact, of course, is an argument in favour of
thesubconscious idea.
L, myfellow-medium, had never seen a ouija board
until one evening he came bychance to my house. That, of course, is the mediums
point of view whileexperimenting.
So we pursued the same method as on the
formeroccasion. It does notstrengthen the sub-conscious theory. Dingwall,
researchofficer of the Society for Psychical Research; Mr.
His words were in reality his children rather than
hisideas. Replies to my questions are as vague as such replies generally are. That
is naturally what the man in thestreet says when he glances at these
writings.
I found that I could get communications from Wilde
sitting at theouija board alone.
V, had several sittings for ouijaboard work with me
at the British College of Psychic Science.
It must be clear andthere must be material which I
can make use of. Wilde answered: Achaotic confusion of fluid nebulosities, a cloaque
of souls.
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |