bug-coreutils archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:snapshot: 406 ]

Total 406 documents matching your query.

241. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:48:40 +0200
Perfect. Thanks.
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00091.html (9,827 bytes)

242. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:46:01 +0200
Thanks for working on that. Previously, copying with cp -a, symlink times would not be preserved (silently, since cp made no attempt). It sounds like with this change, on systems without utimensat, c
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00093.html (9,200 bytes)

243. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:39:25 +0100
I was wondering about printing the warning, and was wary about now silently not preserving symlink times. I.E. being silently inconsistent. I guess it's better to be quiet in this case? That also mea
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00095.html (10,989 bytes)

244. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:14:56 +0200
I too had my doubts initially, but then noticed that rsync is also silent about this. I pushed your change with a few small log/comment tweaks. Thanks again! * src/copy.c (copy_internal): On systems
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00105.html (10,150 bytes)

245. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:29:42 +0000 (UTC)
On cygwin, 'make' completes, but 'make check' issues a warning (and fails if I also add -Werror to CFLAGS): ccache gcc -std=gnu99 -gdwarf-2 -Wall -Werror -Wl,--as-needed -o stdbuf.exe stdbuf.o libver
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00107.html (9,312 bytes)

246. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:37:59 +0200
Thanks for the feedback! In that case, the configure-time check for is-an-ELF-system must be failing on cygwin: optional_pkglib_progs= AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether this is an ELF system]) AC_EGREP_CPP([y
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00108.html (10,177 bytes)

247. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:53:12 +0000 (UTC)
No: configure:43745: checking whether this is an ELF system configure:43761: result: no But there might be some missing holes where 'make check' tries to build stdbuf without regards to the result of
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00109.html (8,604 bytes)

248. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:11:12 +0200
Then I suspect a portability problem, because if I simulate failure of that configure-time test, "make" does not try to build stdbuf or libstdbuf* on gnu/linux. If you can see (looking at src/Makefil
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00110.html (8,016 bytes)

249. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:13:11 +0000 (UTC)
misc/stdbuf hangs (cygwin still has some fifo issues that might be at play, but more importantly, dd appears to be stuck trying to write to a fifo that never gets filled because stdbuf isn't working)
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00111.html (7,496 bytes)

250. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:20:34 +0200
That should not run if stdbuf is not built. Here's a patch: -- src/remove.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/remove.c b/src/remove.c index 80be53
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00112.html (9,170 bytes)

251. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:25:00 +0000 (UTC)
The final list of failures on cygwin 1.7 (I'll need to investigate further, and still want to rerun this under pristine conditions. I'm not even going to bother running this under cygwin 1.5.x): FAIL
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00113.html (7,368 bytes)

252. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:11:34 +0200
... What type of file system is that? (i.e., run this: df -hT .) Please try again, but without redirecting output to /dev/null: sleep 1 & pid=$! tail --pid=$pid -f f || fail=1 i.e., apply this patch:
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00125.html (9,599 bytes)

253. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:22:19 +0100
I think this was also fixed with my inotify fixup patch. cheers, Pádraig.
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00126.html (8,354 bytes)

254. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:33:24 +0200
Oh. Good! Thanks.
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00127.html (8,384 bytes)

255. Re: no feedback on snapshot? coreutils-7.5 coming soon (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 12:16:17 -0500
Seems to, since I cannot repeat it anymore. But, for the record, the FS is an ext3. Cheers, ..C.. Attachment: signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00128.html (8,829 bytes)

256. new snapshot available: coreutils-7.4.125-eca6 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:26:20 +0200
Pádraig fixed a few bugs (thanks!), and I've pulled in the latest from gnulib, so here's another snapshot. Thanks to everyone who has been helping. I'm expecting to switch from statfs to statvfs aft
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00141.html (9,610 bytes)

257. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.4.125-eca6 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:48:31 -0400
`make && make check` passes for me: - non-root user - glibc-2.10.1 - gcc-4.4.1 - linux-2.6.30.4 - x86_64 system -mike Attachment: signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00142.html (7,669 bytes)

258. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.4.125-eca6 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:51:54 +0200
Good to hear. Thanks for the speedy feedback!
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00144.html (6,213 bytes)

259. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.4.125-eca6 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:58:55 +0200
make && make check passes for me too: - non-root - Debian/sid (linux 2.6.30, gcc 4.3.4, glibc 2.9) - x86_32 system Erik
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00146.html (6,860 bytes)

260. Re: new snapshot available: coreutils-7.4.125-eca6 (score: 1)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:49:06 +0200
Thank you, too!
/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2009-08/msg00148.html (6,520 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu