bug-parted archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ No: 3511 ] [ Implementation: 248 ]

Total 165 documents matching your query.

41. Parted 1.6.11 croaks when 'sparse_super' is set? (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 17:56:20 -0400
Parted appears to not be able to deal with ext2 filesystems that have sparse_super set. I first noticed this when running parted (and qtparted) from the SystemRescueCD (http://sysresccd.org). I downl
/archive/html/bug-parted/2004-05/msg00048.html (7,579 bytes)

42. Re: QTParted/reiserfs trashes (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 10:15:34 +0200
I'm sure, that reiserfs is not changed since that times. The reason of bugs is possible bug in resize code of progsreiserfs or/and using it on slightly corrupted filesystem. It is possible, but fact
/archive/html/bug-parted/2004-03/msg00034.html (7,492 bytes)

43. Re: QTParted/reiserfs trashes (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:16:08 +0200
reiserfsprogs is official progs from NAMESYS. And progsreierfs is not official different implementation. It has fully different interface. Parted uses progsreiserfs, because it is easy to use it. It
/archive/html/bug-parted/2004-03/msg00023.html (7,513 bytes)

44. Re: 1.6.4, 1.6.5: Filesystem has incompatible feature enabled (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 08:16:59 -0700
OK, that was easy enough, and I no longer get the "incompatible feature" problem; now it's "strange layout": No Implementation: This ext2 filesystem has a rather strange layout! Parted can't resize t
/archive/html/bug-parted/2003-05/msg00048.html (6,567 bytes)

45. Re: Bug#146607: parted: documentation and online help don't match actual capability (ext3) (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 07:17:06 +1100
Yeah, just more bureaucracy. The [reiserfs] bit isn't trivial. libparted doesn't expose whether functionality is external, etc. I thought you said you get the above error message? Typo? Cheers, Andre
/archive/html/bug-parted/2002-12/msg00069.html (6,205 bytes)

46. Re: Bug#146607: parted: documentation and online help don't match actual capability (ext3) (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 22:59:36 +1100
Hi Andrew, I got this bug report ages ago, but never forwareded it to you, cause I never really knew what to do with it. I'd suggest that this bug be taken as a request to change the online help to s
/archive/html/bug-parted/2002-12/msg00064.html (7,326 bytes)

47. Re: Error with libreiserfs (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:23:13 +1100
Ah, ooops! Basically: that error makes sense (to us programmers), because the constraint is: "there is no way to do this" (NULL). So, what should ped_file_system_get_create_constraint() return if the
/archive/html/bug-parted/2002-12/msg00059.html (4,752 bytes)

48. Re: Lost partition and segfaulted with parted... (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:01:53 +1000
Ah, I see where you got confused. You thought because you pressed cancel, you were cancelling the deletion, but you were actually cancelling the process of informing the kernel about changes. When yo
/archive/html/bug-parted/2002-08/msg00113.html (7,299 bytes)

49. Lost partition and segfaulted with parted... (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 22:30:15 +1000
Hi. parted 1.6.3 on kernel 2.4.19 I was about to do some resizing/reorganizing of a hdd with parted. Basically I've got weird results, and lost a partition. I tried to rescue it, but it detected a hf
/archive/html/bug-parted/2002-08/msg00111.html (8,479 bytes)

50. RE: PATCH: fix gcc bug and big-endian issues for GPT (score: 13)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 09:31:56 -0600
And if Intel's "little-endian-only doctrine were to hold across the board, never", but Intel's not the only game in town. But it could in theory later. I took my direction here from conversations wi
/archive/html/bug-parted/2002-04/msg00034.html (8,346 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu