bug-parted archive search

51. Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] NTFS resizer (score: 13)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 12:45:22 +0100

thought Hmmm. Looking at the code.... I think things should be more file and attribute centric, rather than mft-record centric. I hadn't even started on files stuff hence the lack of support. For att

/archive/html/bug-parted/2001-08/msg00038.html (12,273 bytes)

52. Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port. (score: 13)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 00:16:09 +1100

Hi Neal, Wow! This is a very big patch/change. I've been "playing" with 1.5.x also (after 1.5.1-pre1), mainly with file system stuff. So, I think we should fork for the time being. When the file syst

/archive/html/bug-parted/2001-03/msg00014.html (16,635 bytes)

53. Re: [Evms] Questions about portability (score: 13)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 15:40:01 -0200

Yes. But the front-end doesn't know how to generate the rule. I think it's better to be able to plan ahead. yep. The rules are resizer dependent. I intend to change the resizer, so it duplicates all

/archive/html/bug-parted/2000-12/msg00055.html (22,022 bytes)

54. qtparted broken - kubuntu 6.10 install (score: 11)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 12:57:13 -0500 (EST)

No Implementation: Partition 3 isn't aligned to cylinder boundaries. This is still unsupported. A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted http://www.gnu.org/software/part

/archive/html/bug-parted/2006-12/msg00007.html (4,869 bytes)

55. [PATCH] Enhancements to parted's partition table printing (score: 11)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 20:46:22 +0000

At present, the 'parted' command-line tool is really more useful for interactive use than anything else. The particular deficiency that's biting me is that there's no really good way to use it to dum

/archive/html/bug-parted/2005-11/msg00354.html (22,191 bytes)

56. Please, is anyone out there? More info (score: 11)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:44:53 -0400 (EDT)

I ran this on a Fedora Core 4 machine (latest parted) and got this message on a resize command: Error: Filesystem has incompatible feature enabled Note: This is a totally vanilla ext3 partition. I pu

/archive/html/bug-parted/2005-09/msg00206.html (9,539 bytes)

57. Please, is anyone out there? (score: 11)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:47:05 -0400 (EDT)

I have gotten no response at all since I posted. Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong (if anything)? Does the resize command work? I really need a clue to get started. TIA -- Time flies like the

/archive/html/bug-parted/2005-09/msg00204.html (6,651 bytes)

58. Re: This ext2 filesystem has a rather strange layout! (score: 11)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 11:08:05 +0200

Have you tried to resize the extended partition (no. 4) first? Cheers, Axel

/archive/html/bug-parted/2005-04/msg00080.html (7,093 bytes)

59. Re: version (1.6.9) (score: 11)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:53:55 -0500

Xavimetal wrote: $ sudo qtparted Error: Can't have a partition outside the disk! A bug has been detected in GNU parted. Please email a bug report to address@hidden containing the version (1.6.9) and

/archive/html/bug-parted/2005-02/msg00084.html (5,571 bytes)

60. Re: Shifted partition starts (score: 11)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 01:43:50 +0200 (MEST)

Yes, but that's not the case. Based on a log file, no delete and recreation, just resize (there is indeed a message, "No Implementation: ..." but the partition is resized and the partition start shif

/archive/html/bug-parted/2004-09/msg00102.html (5,391 bytes)