bug-parted archive search

71. Re: [Surprise-dev] GNU Parted and Partition Surprise (score: 11)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 13:54:17 +0200

... BTW have you really read "docs/sgml/{user,tech}.sgml" ? I've uploaded it now for your pleasure to: http://vellum.cz/~short/priv/surprise/user.html http://vellum.cz/~short/priv/surprise/tech.html

/archive/html/bug-parted/2001-07/msg00085.html (12,284 bytes)

72. parted pre8 Apple_Void oddness (score: 11)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 01:06:53 -0900

Hi, testing parted 1.4 pre8 seems pretty good so far. couple things: it no longer detects HFS filesystems. i somehow ended up with a zero length Apple_Void partition, yuk! address@hidden /root]# mac-

/archive/html/bug-parted/2000-11/msg00007.html (8,318 bytes)

73. bug#36908: parted optimal alignment fails minimal alignment check (score: 9)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 16:08:32 +1000

Thank you -- that's a very good point. Just in case if this thread would get indexed, I would add a reference for usb-storage quirks: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/kernel-paramet

/archive/html/bug-parted/2019-08/msg00006.html (12,357 bytes)

74. bug#36908: parted optimal alignment fails minimal alignment check (score: 9)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 12:15:01 -0400

I'm not a parted dev, just a user, but I've run into this same issue several times. This wouldn't happen to be a USB device using the UAS driver? IME setting quirks mode for such devices so they use

/archive/html/bug-parted/2019-08/msg00001.html (11,356 bytes)

75. bug#15356: [PATCH 00/19] Fedora parted patches (score: 9)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 21:02:11 -0400

--BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSSM2TAAoJEJrBOlT6nu75r7sH/2930x5RmfPx1kAd5//NK7Hk TbeDEaE6O9

/archive/html/bug-parted/2013-09/msg00037.html (8,710 bytes)

76. bug#15356: [PATCH 00/19] Fedora parted patches (score: 9)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:59:26 -0700

Hi Phillip, I have found that the discipline imposed by having to write up that style of ChangeLog entry tends to help me spot my own errors (as I write it), and also makes it easier to review change

/archive/html/bug-parted/2013-09/msg00036.html (7,911 bytes)

77. Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions (score: 9)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 22:52:30 -0400

No, feel free. The simplest rule of thumb is to start a partition at 1MB, and specify all partition sizes in whole MB's. It solves this, and maybe also for SSDs. The open question is some SSDs have 2

/archive/html/bug-parted/2013-05/msg00007.html (7,289 bytes)

78. Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions (score: 9)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 07:20:19 -0500 (CDT)

Thanks Chris, excellent point about the version. I stick with Debian's packages whenever I can, but I certainly don't mind trying the latest version of parted. I will let you know how that goes. In t

/archive/html/bug-parted/2013-05/msg00004.html (9,027 bytes)

79. Re: Calculating optimal disk partitions (score: 9)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 17:46:06 -0400

It's an older version of parted. I'd try it with 3.1. In any case, it's difficult because while 512B physical/logical sector drives should default to an alignment value of 1 sector, this probably isn

/archive/html/bug-parted/2013-05/msg00003.html (7,771 bytes)

80. Re: parted 2.1 crash with (encrypted) Apple Core Storage partition (score: 9)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:20:31 +0100

Thanks for the detailed report. I'd guess it's probably hitting one of these PED_ASSERTs: (this is from the latest -- may have changed since 2.1) ped_geometry_read (const PedGeometry* geom, void* buf

/archive/html/bug-parted/2012-02/msg00024.html (11,493 bytes)