- 81. parted 2.1 crash with (encrypted) Apple Core Storage partition (score: 9)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:27:56 -0700
- Summary: An Apple laptop containing a single drive, GPT, with 8 partitions, booting CentOS 6.0, anaconda crashes with a backtrace implicating libparted. Running "parted -l" results in a crash as well
- /archive/html/bug-parted/2012-02/msg00022.html (8,610 bytes)
- 82. Re: Partitions not detected (score: 9)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:28:36 +0100
- (See inline text below) Ignaz Forster schrieb am 10.01.2011 21:25 Uhr: I've played around a bit this weekend and it seems I have found the error: Parted seems to be confused if both a MBR partition t
- /archive/html/bug-parted/2011-01/msg00033.html (8,936 bytes)
- 83. Re: Partitions not detected (score: 9)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:25:58 +0100
- Jim Meyering schrieb am 10.01.2011 10:05 Uhr: Sorry, I forgot to write that: I've tried both 2.2 and 2.3 with the same result. This is interesting. The dump contains the string "Apple_partition_map"
- /archive/html/bug-parted/2011-01/msg00016.html (8,053 bytes)
- 84. Re: Partitions not detected (score: 9)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:05:58 +0100
- Thanks for the report, but what version of parted are you using? If you're using a relatively recent version of parted, then the fact that you're seeing that diagnostic means that device has a PC98 p
- /archive/html/bug-parted/2011-01/msg00014.html (6,490 bytes)
- 85. Partitions not detected (score: 9)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:10:00 +0100
- Hi, I fear I need some help with Parted. The two partitions of a disk are not detected, instead a message about a third partition is printed: If I remember correctly the disk was partitioned using cf
- /archive/html/bug-parted/2011-01/msg00012.html (6,176 bytes)
- 86. Partitions not detected (score: 9)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:53:48 +0100
- Hi, I fear I need some help with Parted. When trying to use Parted with with my external hard disk it's two partitions are not detected, instead a message about a third partition is printed: If I rem
- /archive/html/bug-parted/2011-01/msg00005.html (6,219 bytes)
- 87. Where is the GNU parted repository? (score: 9)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 17:00:06 +0900
- Hi, Is there any public accessible source code repository of GNU parted? I've checked the site http://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=parted and tried to download by cvs but I got following error. $ cvs
- /archive/html/bug-parted/2010-07/msg00001.html (4,972 bytes)
- 88. Re: [PATCH parted 1/5] dasd: Cleanup anchor handling (score: 9)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:00:24 +0100
- Hi, On 11/04/2009 10:32 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: Hans de Goede wrote: The current dasd label code keeps an fdasd anchor struct in the DasdDiskSpecific struct, and fills this during dasd_read. However
- /archive/html/bug-parted/2009-11/msg00009.html (8,018 bytes)
- 89. Re: parted bug? (score: 9)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:21:48 +0000
- giorgio bellussi wrote: No Implementation: Partition 3 isn't aligned to cylinder boundaries. This is still unsupported. Backtrace has 20 calls on stack: 20: /lib/libparted-1.8.so.9(ped_assert+0x3b) [
- /archive/html/bug-parted/2009-02/msg00003.html (5,303 bytes)
- 90. parted bug? (score: 9)
- Author: HIDDEN
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:25:51 +0100
- No Implementation: Partition 3 isn't aligned to cylinder boundaries. This is still unsupported. Backtrace has 20 calls on stack: 20: /lib/libparted-1.8.so.9(ped_assert+0x3b) [0xb76b491b] 19: /lib/lib
- /archive/html/bug-parted/2009-02/msg00001.html (5,878 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu