Namazu: a Full-Text Search Engine

This index contains 81,291 documents and 1,265,498 keywords.

Last modified: 2024-05-06


Query: [How to search]

Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ SWIG: 3552 ]

Total 3552 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Reinstalling gnuradio (score: 4)
Author: Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 10:18:22 -0700
The quick solution is a fresh checkout into an empty directory. You could also try: $ cd gnuradio-core/src/lib/swig $ rm gnuradio_swig_python.d $ touch gnuradio_swig_python.d Then start with the ./bo
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00078.html (5,965 bytes)

282. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] new tarballs (score: 4)
Author: Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 10:43:30 -0700
You have a stale installation, or partial installation in more than one place. Remove them all from the installation directories, then make install from the new tarballs. There's a reason we release
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00080.html (7,286 bytes)

283. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] new tarballs (score: 4)
Author: Luis Simoes <lsi@mobnets.rwth-aachen.de>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 14:39:09 +0200
Hi Eric, thanks a lot. Every thing is working fine now. Now I have still one question: Was the module tv_rx extinguished in the new tarballs? My old applications return the message global name tv_rx
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00107.html (8,142 bytes)

284. [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-audio-oss segfaults (score: 2)
Author: Berndt Josef Wulf <wulf@ping.net.au>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 07:50:53 +0930
G'day, gr-audio-oss segfaults when built using the gr-audio-oss-0.8.tar.gz tarball. The reason for this is that the tarball includes audio_oss.cc which normally is created by swig. Consequently, the
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00129.html (6,757 bytes)

285. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-audio-oss segfaults (score: 2)
Author: Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:28:58 -0700
Thanks for the problem report and the solution. Will fix soon. Eric
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00132.html (6,936 bytes)

286. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-audio-oss segfaults (score: 10)
Author: Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 19:05:59 -0700
Hi Berndt, After taking a look at this, I think the problem is in the gnuradio-core build process. All the tarballs that I checked designate the swig generated output files as BUILT_SOURCES, and all
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00141.html (8,320 bytes)

287. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-audio-oss segfaults (score: 16)
Author: Berndt Josef Wulf <wulf@ping.net.au>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 11:52:47 +0930
Not quite sure what you mean. Currently I have to regenerate this file with swig in order to avoid the segfault. The log below shows the part that does go wrong. Note that swig wasn't executed in ord
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00142.html (15,283 bytes)

288. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-audio-oss segfaults (score: 21)
Author: Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 20:11:44 -0700
Note that the compile from the the tarball *does* succeed. It does generate some warnings about "defined but unused", but no compile time errors. I believe the reason you're seeing the segfault (base
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00144.html (11,538 bytes)

289. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-audio-oss segfaults (score: 14)
Author: Berndt Josef Wulf <wulf@ping.net.au>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 16:39:44 +0930
Yes, I know. gdb trace show: --8<-- Loaded symbols for /usr/libexec/ld.elf_so (gdb) where from /usr/pkg/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gnuradio/_audio_oss.so from /usr/pkg/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gn
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00145.html (18,239 bytes)

290. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-audio-oss segfaults (score: 8)
Author: Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 16:32:37 -0700
Hi Berndt, I've spent some more time looking at this problem. I think I know how to fix it "right", but it's going to take a while. Just removing the output of swig causes a failure in the VPATH buil
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00167.html (8,344 bytes)

291. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-audio-oss segfaults (score: 10)
Author: Berndt Josef Wulf <wulf@ping.net.au>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:15:35 +0930
I also could try to update swig in pkgsrc to 1.3.29 if this is what the current files are created by. I just won't hold my breath that this actually will happen (I'm not the package maintainer for sw
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00169.html (9,516 bytes)

292. [Discuss-gnuradio] Problem in gnuradio-core build (score: 7)
Author: "Robert W. McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:09:54 -0400
Something was recently changed in the gnuradio-core make that causes an error: Notice the waiting for jobs. This was compiled with make, not buildit. I was having a problem with doing the build on da
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00189.html (6,769 bytes)

293. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Problem in gnuradio-core build (score: 7)
Author: Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:30:15 -0700
I'm back from traveling and will be sorting out the tarball build problems as soon as I get out from under this email avalanche. I don't think anything has changed in gnuradio-core (at least by me) f
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00208.html (7,492 bytes)

294. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Problem in gnuradio-core build (score: 3)
Author: Robert McGwier <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:34:31 -0400
Eric Blossom wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:09:54PM -0400, Robert McGwier wrote: Something was recently changed in the gnuradio-core make that causes an error: Notice the waiting for jobs. This wa
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00219.html (7,652 bytes)

295. [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio 2.8 release (score: 3)
Author: Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 21:04:52 -0700
OK, Let's try this again ;) I've fixed the tarballs such that the output of swig is no longer in them. This ensures that all modules will be built using the version on swig on the build machine. Plea
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00232.html (4,788 bytes)

296. [Discuss-gnuradio] swig error in compile, gr-atsc stuff (score: 35)
Author: Charles Swiger <cswiger@musicriver.homeunix.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:00:33 -0400
Gang - Wonder if any of the block writing wizards could take a gander at this and spot why the blocks compile, but error out on the - I don't even know what you call it - the swig file? output: creat
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00254.html (5,877 bytes)

297. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] swig error in compile, gr-atsc stuff (score: 34)
Author: Charles Swiger <cswiger@musicriver.homeunix.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:36:30 -0400
Found it - * Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */ define INCLUDED_ATSC_RS_ENCODER_H <-- D'oh!!! include <gr_sync_block.h> include <atsc_types.h> class atsc_ds_to_softds; typedef boost::shared_ptr<atsc_ds_t
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00264.html (5,079 bytes)

298. [Discuss-gnuradio] Adding a block in tarball distribution (score: 4)
Author: Achilleas Anastasopoulos <anastas@umich.edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:15:33 -0400
I am using the 2.7 tarballs. Suppose I want to add a block to my local gnuradio-core. I put the *.i, *.h, *.cc files in gnuradio-core2.7/src/lib/general and modify Makefile.am Now after make clean, c
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00295.html (4,948 bytes)

299. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Adding a block in tarball distribution (score: 7)
Author: Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:30:10 -0700
You have to add the includes of the .h and .i file to the directory specific foo.i include file. In the case of lib/general, the file is called general.i FYI, the top level source file fed to swig is
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00296.html (5,712 bytes)

300. Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] SDCC build note for Fedora Core 5 (score: 2)
Author: Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:25:48 -0400
More notes: Fedora Extras 5 now includes wxPython 2.6.3.2 and all its requirements. So on a stock FC5 install, a simple 'yum install wxPython-devel' will get you all you need to compile the wxgui por
/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-04/msg00300.html (6,191 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu v2.0.21

sysadmin@gnu.org