emacs-devel archive search

Results:

References: [ Slow: 5517 ] [ access: 7253 ] [ to (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ files (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ using (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ UNC: 158 ] [ path: 7301 ]

Total 108 documents matching your query.

101. Re: Slow access to files using UNC path (score: -1,284): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:59:23 +0530; Hi, Based on some inputs from dak/eliz and some extra digging into Elisp, I have the following version which can show good improvements in the behaviour from user point of view (in comparision wrt XE; /archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-07/msg00467.html (6,272 bytes)
102. Re: Slow access to files using UNC path (score: -1,255): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 11:42:25 +0530; Hello, It should match: "\\" or "//" , which is basically 2 forward/backward slashes In normal regexp: I would have used: ^(\\\\|//) or as dak suggested: (string-match "^\(//\|\\\\\\\\\)") This just; /archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-07/msg00460.html (7,936 bytes)
103. Re: Slow access to files using UNC path (score: -1,249): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 07:09:32 +0200; AFAIK, Windows behaves the same no matter if you pass it a forward slash or a backslash. But a UNC _must_ start with two of them, so "^[/\\]" is not good enough. It should be "^[/\\][/\\]" or someth; /archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-07/msg00459.html (6,711 bytes)
104. Re: Slow access to files using UNC path (score: -1,244): Author: HIDDEN; Date: 18 Jul 2004 04:31:54 +0200; That's not the same. The first matches either // or \ at the start of a filename, the latter matches either / or \ at the start of a filename. I don't know the context, though: maybe the second actua; /archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-07/msg00457.html (6,711 bytes)
105. Re: Slow access to files using UNC path (score: -1,244): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 20:00:48 +0200; (if (string-match "^[/\\]" file) Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 2; /archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-07/msg00450.html (6,457 bytes)
106. Re: Slow access to files using UNC path (score: -1,310): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:53:18 +0530; Hello, On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:22:01 -0500, "Peter Lee" <address@hidden> said: I just realised that XEmacs does something like find-file-literally (and a little more, I guess). If I use find-file-lite; /archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-07/msg00445.html (7,291 bytes)
107. Re: Slow access to files using UNC path (score: -1,288): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 08:22:01 -0500; Dhruva> Hello, I find accessing a file using UNC path using GNU Dhruva> Emacs (CVS Head, W2K and MinGW32 build) very slow when Dhruva> compared to XEmacs. Has anyone experienced the same and Dhruva>; /archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-07/msg00414.html (6,035 bytes)
108. Slow access to files using UNC path (score: -1,299): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:10:45 +0530; Hello, I find accessing a file using UNC path using GNU Emacs (CVS Head, W2K and MinGW32 build) very slow when compared to XEmacs. Has anyone experienced the same and explored the reason? Since I wor; /archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-07/msg00410.html (5,760 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 108
Page: [1] [2]