This updates the Alacritty terminfo to the latest revision available in its repository. Since there have been some changes made to the xterm base, it does not use the xterm terminfo anymore. However
Oh, that explains a lot of misunderstandings I've had with your original email, thanks for clearing that up. The original cause behind this patch was actually a report that mouse interactions weren't
In version 0.8.0 Alacritty added support for synchronized terminal updates as documented here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/terminal-wg/specifications/-/merge_requests/2 The proposal itself does no
This adds the `Smulx` capability to Alacritty, since it has recently gained support for the custom underline escapes using the colon separator. Currently the double underline is the only explicitly s
no - the reverse. In my comments before the entry, I had observed in the older version that ech didn't work properly, and later it did. In the entry I had left it cancelled, e.g., ech@, Removing that
I'd assume by this you mean that the `ech` feature should be removed, since Alacritty does not support it? I've checked `vttest` and it performed exactly as XTerm, with the small exception that the w
yes (to make kmous consistent with XM/xm) hmm - errors in xm may be present, since nothing checks it: ...but XM is used (and ultimately, checked) -- Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden> https://invisibl
Oh, since Archlinux uses 6.1, that patch wasn't yet applied on my ncurses. However after testing with Gentoo, I can confirm that it's not an issue anymore. However to make this work with Alacritty, t
The mouse issue (XM/xm) was addressed here: 20181124 + modify the initialization checks for mouse so that the xterm+sm+1006 block will work with terminal descriptions not mentioning xterm (report by
While the comment states that focus in/out events are not supported in 0.4.0, I've verified that the latest version behaves like XTerm for this escape and thus added the capabilities to Alacritty's t
I've been busy, but took a quick look last night. Offhand (I haven't investigated the key-modifiers), the only change needed appears to be the overlooked "ech" feature. I'll have to retest that (but
^NOT agreed (looking at the time, it was rather early here...) with that in mind, I may have further typos both. If you read through the former closely, you'll notice many cases where I found that ju
I'd assume you mean you're NOT going to use changes from that source? At least this message doesn't make sense to me otherwise. If you don't mind, I'd love some elaboration on why not. Is the issue w
sorry, but I'm going to use changes from that source. -- Thomas E. Dickey <dickey@invisible-island.net> https://invisible-island.net ftp://ftp.invisible-island.net Attachment: signature.asc Descripti
I took a look (but have no intention of making those suggested fixes, since they would not be useful in ncurses) -- Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-islan
The alacritty people are creating a terminfo entry for their terminal. * https://github.com/jwilm/alacritty/pull/578 I am confident that any help in making it better would be welcome.
Thomas and Alan, Now that a fix for cdialog has been committed, what is the next step toward getting dialog fixed in head (13.0-CURRENT)? Let me know what I can do. Thanks. David Boyd.