I'd suggest you to just create another (correct) branch from the tagged revision and then forget your first branch has been ever created. Suppose the name of your tag is "my-tag" and the the module i
cvs -H export Usage: cvs export [-NRfln] [-r rev] [-D date] [-d dir] [-k kopt] module... -N Don't shorten module paths if -d specified. -f Force a head revision match if tag/date not found. -l Local
Please do not post MIME and/or HTML encrypted messages to the list. Plain text only, PLEASE! You're confusing the revision numbers of the individual files with the revision number of your module. The
Greg answered most of your questions. Let me just fill in one missing piece: *Except* for the vendor branch. The rule is: if a file was imported to the vendor branch, and nobody has yet checked in an
My monthly resend of this script. I guess I'll include the script directly this time in the hopes that maybe people don't like attachments and that's the reason I still haven't gotten a response from
Hi, I've read the discussions recently on this matter, and the suggesitions don't seem to apply to this case: Is there any way to get log information with the specific criteria: show logs: where revi
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (address@hidden [199.232.76.164]) by gateway.camelot.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id KAA19177 for <address@hidden>; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:25:19 +0900 Rec
[ On Monday, July 9, 2001 at 00:01:01 (-0400), Eric Siegerman wrote: ] Well, with CVS the meaning of "frozen" file is quite a bit different. In the most basic sense what I'm saying is that "-kv" shou
Look at the contents of the CVS/Entries files - they contain the revision which your local copy is based on. If you change this number without changing the source files accordingly (that's what happe
Hi. Please post cvs quesitons directly to the group and start a new thread for a new question. Why? Not sure what you mean. What is the output of cvs diff -r 1.1.1.1 -r 1.1 f1.c?
[ On , October 11, 2001 at 15:48:02 (-0400), Sam Steingold wrote: ] You're not making sense. You need to understand the much deeper issues of trying to include rename information in a change control
[ On , October 11, 2001 at 10:39:50 (-0400), Sam Steingold wrote: ] no, actually it is not. You are not properly understanding how CVS uses filenames and how it manages change to those files. CVS tra
It's only tied to those algorithms when displaying differences and performing merges. There are lots of situations, even in a CVS environment, where those features simply are not useful. And yet, th
[ On Tuesday, July 24, 2001 at 14:27:07 (-0400), Noel L Yap wrote: ] How backwards your logic is, Noel. "Popular demand" often (mostly?) has nothing to do with reality. You can't change the reality o
Hez, It is not in the spec - so it is implementation specific, so different flavours/versions of CVS/DCVS/OpenCVS/CVSNT may do different things. Generally as a rule I think the servers will send the
So far, so good... Not so good. Here's what I would do. 0) Back up the repository. 1) Tell everyone to stop committing while you fix the mess. 2) Get a branch sandbox. cd some/clean/directory cvs che
Well I seem to remember a bunch of messages like I foo/bar/CVS Done. (Love those Network Appliance snapshots!) Ouch, that looks like a lot of work. Since my local changes to the previous version were
Thank you, it works now! Cheers I'm using Tortoise CVS, it works pretty well, but today I had a problem that I don't understand : cvs server: cannot commit with sticky date for file `Principal.cpp' c
Hi, I have a situation I would like to suggestions. I have a vendor branch in my cvs tree with vendor branch revision 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.2 we made some change to revision 1.1.1.2, so the revision number i
So I guess I should have read: "When you import a new file, the vendor branch is made the `head' revision, so anyone that checks out a copy of the file gets that revision. When a local modification i