Commit cf065aba1ec14bdacab7a5a6bddbdfd7661cd409 seems to have broken node, which subsequently broke ungoogled-chromium. It should still be possible to upgrade node to the latest LTS version 10.16.3,
In Chromium if you click on the camera button right of the address bar, you can see the per-domain permissions. In my case, they are granted to meet.jit.si. The compile-time configuration javascript
I have the same issue, but the pavucontrol trick does not do it for me as I have only one microphone (the one of my webcam on my laptop) and it's not muted. ungoogled-chromium complains about an "Err
Hi Martin, Thank you for reporting this problem and proposing a patch. I’d prefer not to propagate any fonts. Do you happen to know what the mechanism underlying the fix is? Why does this fix the p
I'm not the OP, but I got the same error message while attempting to install ungoogled-chromium. Here's the last 100 lines of my log. I can submit the entire compressed file if it would be helpful.
Unfortunately, you cropped the interesting part of the error message. Can you show us more? It would interesting to see what happened before. This backtrace just shows us that the command we invoke w
Hello, I am having trouble to install ungoogled-chromium. I've tried several times and with different 'guix pull' commits, but it keeps failing at around 84%. This is from the logs: ninja: build stop
Hello, I'm forwarding this, extracted from this message http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/gnu-linux-libre/2019-02/msg00083.html [...] while ungoogled-chromiun package definition now contains --8<-
[...] This analysis is correct. For DRM to work, the user has to build with "enable_widevine=true", and then somehow obtain 'libwidevinecdm.so' and make the browser use it. Attachment: signature.asc
Right; the source is downloaded from commondatastorage.googleapis.com but that is a technicality. What I'm saying is that the recipe should be updated to cause it to download an already-cleaned up ve
I should probably add on that this position comes from my interaction with the FSF in 2010: When LibreWRT was founded in 2010 (before it later merged into libreCMC) we submitted a similar question
Please show us the paths in our package's source code. We need to remove it if it is there. I looked and cannot find it. I looked at how some other distros do it. They get the Widevine binaries by ex
We know Chromium comes with it. Have you looked through ungoogledchromium to see where it's being deleted? Attachment: signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part