Results:

References:

help-guix: [ foo: 342 ]
guix-devel: [ foo: 1458 ]

Total 1800 documents matching your query.

1. Syntactic Diabetes (was Re: A friendlier API for operating-system declarations) (score: 55): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 22:43:31 +0100; Dear Guixers, Here is a quick status update on my proposition to expose composable functions to change operating-system declarations. Thank you all for the feedback you gave me :) It's very nice to n; /archive/html/guix-devel/2023-11/msg00165.html (32,989 bytes)
2. Re: guix build: error: without-test=foo: unrecognized option (score: 42): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 22:18:01 +0000; An s. → guix build --without-test=foo foo guix build: error: without-test=foo: unrecognized option → guix build --without-tests=foo foo guix build: error: foo: unknown package Attachment: signatu; /archive/html/guix-devel/2021-01/msg00218.html (5,954 bytes)
3. [RFC] package-with-features (score: 37): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:26:16 +0000; Heya Guix, This comment by oriansj on IRC: <oriansj> I am thinking in terms of gentoo builds and making it easy to avoid some packages from being downloaded or built like pulseaudio (I like alsa bett; /archive/html/guix-devel/2022-11/msg00275.html (10,495 bytes)
4. Re: guix build: error: without-test=foo: unrecognized option (score: 36): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 23:30:55 +0100; Hi, [...] ^ An ‘s’. :-) We should display suggestions based on Levenshtein distance. Ludo’.; /archive/html/guix-devel/2021-01/msg00221.html (4,856 bytes)
5. guix build: error: without-test=foo: unrecognized option (score: 36): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:48:53 +0100; Hi, Using Guix 957f0c4 or 0d3f271, I get: --8<--cut here--start-->8-- $ guix build --help-transform | grep test build PACKAGE from the latest commit of BRANCH --without-tests=PACKAGE build PACKAGE wi; /archive/html/guix-devel/2021-01/msg00204.html (4,307 bytes)
6. Output of guix build --check foo is not part of store deduplication (score: 36): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:45:55 +0200; Is there any reason why the output of 'guix build --check ...' is not part of deduplication? I will explain my problem: When checking for (un)reproducibility, we use something like: guix build --chec; /archive/html/help-guix/2018-08/msg00056.html (7,956 bytes)
7. Re: guix build: error: without-test=foo: unrecognized option (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:44:05 +0100; Hi Ludo, Done in patch#45893. Feedback welcome because it is a quick draft for my Friday's procrastination. ;-) <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/45893> Cheers, simon; /archive/html/guix-devel/2021-01/msg00233.html (5,003 bytes)
8. Re: guix build: error: without-test=foo: unrecognized option (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:42:23 +0100; Hi Chris, Ahah! The bug is always between the keyboard and the chair. ;-) Cheers, simon; /archive/html/guix-devel/2021-01/msg00232.html (5,078 bytes)
9. Re: Output of guix build --check foo is not part of store deduplication (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 00:08:09 +0200; Hello! Björn Höfling <address@hidden> skribis: I think it’s on purpose: “-check” items are not registered as valid (in the database), and thus it makes little sense to deduplicate them since; /archive/html/help-guix/2018-08/msg00128.html (6,620 bytes)
10. Re: Output of guix build --check foo is not part of store deduplication (score: 33): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 02:16:13 -0700; Hi Björn, In registerOutputs from nix/libstore/build.cc, it seems that if a check was requested (i.e., buildMode == bmCheck), an exception is thrown when the build is found to be non-deterministic.; /archive/html/help-guix/2018-08/msg00059.html (5,558 bytes)
11. Security-Enhancement: Fine Control for guix pull --allow-downgrades (score: 32): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 00:08:12 +0200; Hi geeks, I've wrote a patch aimed at improving security by introducing fine-grained control over the `guix pull --allow-downgrades`. This allows for precise management of channel downgrades during `; /archive/html/guix-devel/2024-04/msg00082.html (6,551 bytes)
12. [PATCH RFC 1/4] records: Support field sanitizers. (score: 30): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 16:58:27 +0200; * guix/records.scm (make-syntactic-constructor): Add #:sanitizers. [field-sanitizer]: New procedure. [wrap-field-value]: Honor F's sanitizer. (define-record-type*)[field-sanitizer]: New procedure. Pa; /archive/html/guix-devel/2021-05/msg00345.html (13,127 bytes)
13. [PATCH 5/5] import: pypi: Add more tests. (score: 27): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 17:23:25 +0200; * tests/pypi.scm ("pypi->guix-package, no requirements", "pypi->guix-package, no test requirements", "pypi->guix-package, no runtime requirements"): New tests. -- tests/pypi.scm | 137 +++++++++++++++; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-07/msg00592.html (14,714 bytes)
14. GuixSD Service Implementation Problem (score: 25): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 10:45:42 +0330; Hi, I'm working on an application which should be run as a service on GuixSD. I followed other service definitions and add my service definition file inside `GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH` path. but when I add t; /archive/html/help-guix/2018-12/msg00221.html (5,875 bytes)
15. Re: supporting EOL ruby in Guix (score: 24): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 21:44:59 +0800; Ok, so we can drop them for guix. But I think we should still try to fix as many CVEs as possible even if we were to put them into channels (thus not officially supported). Please let me know if some; /archive/html/guix-devel/2018-11/msg00485.html (116,754 bytes)
16. Re: Change defaults of 'define-record-type*' need invalidate auto-compilation caches (score: 21): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2018 11:37:27 +0100; Hi! address@hidden (宋文武) skribis: It’s a feature. :-) Namely, default value resolution happens at macro-expansion time: --8<--cut here--start-->8-- scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix records) sch; /archive/html/guix-devel/2018-01/msg00099.html (6,465 bytes)
17. [PATCH 2/2] guix: build: Add transitive source building. (score: 18): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 08:19:22 -0500; * guix/scripts/build.scm (%options, options->derivations): Add --sources option. * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix build): Document --sources option. * tests/guix-build.sh: Add tests. -- doc/guix.texi |; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-04/msg00466.html (14,553 bytes)
18. [PATCH 2/2] guix: build: Add transitive source building. (score: 18): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:54:01 -0600; * guix/scripts/build.scm (%options): Add --sources option. (package-sources, package-direct-sources) (package-transitive-sources, package-source-derivations): New procedures. (options->derivations)[-; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-02/msg00663.html (16,673 bytes)
19. Re: Syntactic Diabetes (was Re: A friendlier API for operating-system declarations) (score: 17): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 23:50:49 +0100; Am Freitag, dem 24.11.2023 um 22:43 +0100 schrieb Edouard Klein: The naming is a little confusing and imho not clearly helpful. For example, why (.nginx os) instead of the triple (service+ OS SERVIC; /archive/html/guix-devel/2023-11/msg00166.html (9,713 bytes)
20. [PATCH 2/2] utils: Support defaults in substitute-keyword-arguments. (score: 17): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:29:16 -0500; * guix/utils.scm (substitute-keyword-arguments): Allow default value declarations. * tests/utils.scm (substitute-keyword-arguments): New test. -- guix/utils.scm | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++-- tests/util; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg01592.html (8,285 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]