guix-devel archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ gnunet: 672 ] [ publish: 444 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [GSoC] Guix + GNUnet: report (score: 496)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:30:12 +0200 (CEST)
Hello! Working on it! `gnunet-fs -i` should do the thing, otherwise you can search for your store-path using its basename. For instance: $ gnunet-fs -i /gnu/store/zxfivagcmg1r76v137cfjiyzbqcv8bxh-att
/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-08/msg00685.html (7,538 bytes)

2. Re: [GNUnet-developers] GSoC: Binary package distribution through GnuNet (report 2) (score: 477)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:51:07 +0200
Dear Remi, Thanks for the update, and Guile's lack of support for unions does sound like it would cause a painful diversion -- glad to hear you managed to navigate it nevertheless. Maybe Ludo, me and
/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-06/msg00558.html (8,488 bytes)

3. [GSoC] Guix + GNUnet: report (score: 476)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 21:05:16 +0200 (CEST)
Hello! it’s been a while since my last report, time for some news. What happened since last time? —————————————————————————————— After ou
/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-08/msg00455.html (8,342 bytes)

4. Re: gnunet-guile reboot & guix (score: 450)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 11:14:53 +0000
Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 6.3K bytes: Sure. The copied file was a collection of work not only of Remi. There's 2 or 3 threads at least. The idea that GNUnet FS distribution should be an option,
/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-01/msg00171.html (14,526 bytes)

5. Re: gnunet-guile reboot & guix (score: 431)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 10:26:44 +0100
I restarted from scratch the gnunet-guile bindings. It was made much easier thanks to the work of ng0 on gnunet documentation and guile-bytestructures to handle C structs and unions. ... I think I ne
/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-01/msg00170.html (16,714 bytes)

6. Re: [GNUnet-developers] [GSoC] Guix + GNUnet: what’s next (score: 398)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 23:58:52 +0200
Hi! Following the discussion about using GNUnet for software package distribution I started thinking about what kind of data *read access* traces matter to people's privacy. Map data bumped into my m
/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-07/msg00050.html (8,258 bytes)

7. Re: gnunet-fs integration (score: 371)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 08:22:44 +0000
There's also a discussion/open bug about finding a system for more regular tarball releases of gnunet builds. As you might or might not know, the release is equal to a certain revision in the svn of
/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg00642.html (9,457 bytes)

8. Re: [GNUnet-developers] Guix - GNUnet binary ditribution roadmap (score: 366)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:15:38 +0100
Sree Harsha Totakura <address@hidden> skribis: OK. [...] It lists the items that cannot be garbage-collected because they are referenced from a GC root (indirectly.) When the garbage collector runs,
/archive/html/guix-devel/2014-03/msg00143.html (9,942 bytes)

9. Re: [GNUnet-developers] Guix - GNUnet binary ditribution roadmap (score: 366)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:53:29 +0100
Yes, so the service should be using both DHT and MESH services of GNUnet. DHT to publish and lookup packages and MESH for downloading and seeding packages. OK. Yes, if a node is a DHT node that basic
/archive/html/guix-devel/2014-03/msg00142.html (10,273 bytes)

10. GSoC: Binary package distribution through GnuNet (report 2) (score: 354)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:44:28 +0200
Hello! I am still working on the GnuNet bindings: it’s been a much harder and longer work than I thought, but the trickiest parts are done. The main data structures (URIs, configuration handles, me
/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-06/msg00545.html (6,695 bytes)

11. Re: [GSoC] Guix + GNUnet: report (score: 330)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 23:02:57 +0200
[+Cc: gnunet-developers] Hi Rémi, Thanks for the report. address@hidden skribis: OK. The FFI makes it easy to shoot oneself in the foot in such ways (for instance when using invalid struct layout, o
/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-08/msg00504.html (8,046 bytes)

12. Re: gnunet-fs integration (score: 327)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 17:17:47 +0000
Hi, read an update inline commented. Update: currently some refactoring is happening, grothf just started refactoring the client api which requires every service to be modified, which takes some time
/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-07/msg00091.html (8,884 bytes)

13. Re: gnunet-fs integration (score: 327)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 14:12:05 +0000
Hi, Work is done towards 0.10.2, there are just some bugtickets left but I can assure you that work is happening regulary and its alive and well :) I take the current incompabilities between 0.10.1 a
/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-07/msg00044.html (7,794 bytes)

14. Re: gnunet-fs integration (score: 323)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 07:14:54 +0000
This one will be solved with 0.10.2 release of GNUnet... ...which is why I no longer need to beware incompabilities. no longer needed, as this is just a package to debug 0.10.2 until it is released.
/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg00636.html (7,998 bytes)

15. Re: gnunet-guile reboot & guix (score: 321)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 00:49:49 +0000
Amirouche Boubekki transcribed 1.5K bytes: Would gnunet-service (in GuixSD, and shepherd as user-process on other systems) help here? I wanted to start debugging my service again in february, maybe e
/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-01/msg00167.html (8,247 bytes)

16. gnunet-guile reboot & guix (take two) (score: 316)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:10:36 +0100
Hello all, After discussing gnunet & guix at fosdem with gnunet people I have better picture of where things can go. The short story is: 1) There is no way to know the gnunet hash aka. gnunet uri of
/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-02/msg00034.html (5,284 bytes)

17. gnunet-fs integration (score: 316)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:12:41 +0000
Hi, While I'm still new to guile and guix, one of my main motivations since I started contributing to guix was an item on the end of the roadmap, using a decentralized system to distribute updates. I
/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-07/msg00007.html (6,880 bytes)

18. Re: [GNUnet-developers] Guix - GNUnet binary ditribution roadmap (score: 314)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:46:06 +0100
Ludo, would you please consider moving to the GNU Name System? GNS is based on SDSI/SPKI (delegation certificates!), and has many other advantages (not to mention uses Curve25519 instead of RSA). GNU
/archive/html/guix-devel/2014-03/msg00147.html (8,696 bytes)

19. Re: [GSoC] Guix + GNUnet: what’s next (score: 312)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 22:32:25 +0200
(Sorry, I had misspelled the GNUnet mailing list address.) Rémi Birot-Delrue <address@hidden> skribis: Sounds good! I wasn’t use whether the ID passed to ‘gnunet-publish -t’ could be used as a
/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-07/msg00045.html (7,813 bytes)

20. Re: [GNUnet-developers] Guix - GNUnet binary ditribution roadmap (score: 308)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:23:41 +0100
Yes, it is possible to store multiple values under the same key. The results of the lookup for that key will then contain none, some or all of those values. Later, as an optimisation, we can build a
/archive/html/guix-devel/2014-03/msg00145.html (8,315 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu