guix-devel archive search

Results:

References: [ load-path: 210 ]

Total 210 documents matching your query.

121. Auxiliary files (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 12:34:01 +0100; Hi Alex, Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis: [...] I imagine linux-conf/ would contain several files (all the configuration files), and so on. IOW, we can create directories anytime there’s a categ; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-12/msg01174.html (8,044 bytes)
122. Re: [PATCH] Remove Emacs interface. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 23:43:44 +0300; Added, thanks! Committed. But we keep all patches in a single directory, why should there be multiple dirs for auxiliary files? I don't like keeping such files in "gnu/packages" the most! My opinion; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-12/msg01118.html (9,305 bytes)
123. Re: [PATCH] Remove Emacs interface. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:40:57 +0100; Hi! Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis: OK! I was thinking that, even if the Emacs-Guix manual isn’t available online currently, this change would lead users following the link in the HTML manual t; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-12/msg01101.html (8,416 bytes)
124. Re: How to boot GuixSD in LXD (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:24:47 +0100; David Craven <address@hidden> skribis: Scary, no? :-) To understand where this code comes from, you can look at the output of ‘guix system extension-graph’, specifically arrows that flow in the �; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-12/msg00777.html (6,754 bytes)
125. Re: How to boot GuixSD in LXD (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:27:41 +0100; Hi David, I'm not familiar with LXD, so it might be helpful if you could share more details of how you created the LXD image. That sounds like it could work. I believe what you are looking for is the; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-12/msg00733.html (7,253 bytes)
126. Re: Offloading to use Guile-SSH instead of lsh (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:06:36 +0200; If I understand it correctly, as part of `guix pull' we get the latest package definitions, but `guix' and `guix-daemon' are at the guix-snapshot version, aka 0.11.0-4. If instead `guix-daemon' was f; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-11/msg01149.html (9,918 bytes)
127. Re: Offloading to use Guile-SSH instead of lsh (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 23:10:53 +0100; address@hidden (宋文武) skribis: Bah, what a mess! ‘guix offload’ needs Guile-SSH 0.10.2, but ‘guix offload’ is only invoked from guix-daemon, and guix-daemon is not updated using ‘guix; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-11/msg01134.html (8,441 bytes)
128. Re: Website development questions (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:37:49 +0100; Luis Felipe López Acevedo <address@hidden> skribis: [...] Damn it, I’m running out of ideas. :-) It’s pretty clear that patches are not searched for under /home/anonimo/Documentos/guix, which co; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-11/msg01050.html (10,641 bytes)
129. Re: Offloading to use Guile-SSH instead of lsh (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:11:34 +0800; I push a commit 5aed7f10f to add guile-ssh to the load-path of the pull builder (the commit message refers a wrong commit, sorry) to fix it. But as ng0 report in #guix, the 0.11 install media is stil; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-11/msg01045.html (7,455 bytes)
130. Re: d3js chord diagrams (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:46:39 +0200; Yes. A force-directed graph could be made clearer by applying force bundling as is done here: <https://github.com/upphiminn/d3.ForceBundle>. We could map the graph to a collapsible tree such as this; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg01235.html (9,124 bytes)
131. Re: d3js chord diagrams (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:01:26 +0200; Hi! Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis: Awesome! Much better than staring at a static graph in Evince. Are there other types of visualizations supported by d3 that would help? What about having; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg01230.html (7,616 bytes)
132. [PATCH 2/6] gnu: %default-extra-linux-options: Remove redundant options. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 12:34:43 +0200; * gnu/packages/linux.scm (%default-extra-linux-options): Remove redundant options. -- gnu/packages/linux.scm | 14 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg01963.html (8,995 bytes)
133. [PATCH 2/2] utils: Support defaults in substitute-keyword-arguments. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:29:16 -0500; * guix/utils.scm (substitute-keyword-arguments): Allow default value declarations. * tests/utils.scm (substitute-keyword-arguments): New test. -- guix/utils.scm | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++-- tests/util; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg01592.html (8,285 bytes)
134. [PATCH 1/2] utils: Fix default-keyword-arguments. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:29:15 -0500; * guix/utils.scm (default-keyword-arguments): Properly test for present keywords. * tests/utils.scm (default-keyword-arguments): New test. -- guix/utils.scm | 2 +- tests/utils.scm | 12 ++++++++++++ 2; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg01591.html (6,397 bytes)
135. Re: [PATCH 08/17] gnu: make-linux-libre: Add additional-configuration parameter. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 23:13:31 +0200; David Craven <address@hidden> skribis: Why not, but from the rest of the patch it’s not clear if it’s actually used, is it? If we take that route, I would suggest a more idiomatic approach, like:; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg00961.html (10,999 bytes)
136. [PATCH 08/17] gnu: make-linux-libre: Add additional-configuration parameter. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:34:17 +0200; * gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre): Use %default-additional-kernel-configuration. (%default-additional-kernel-configuration): New variable. -- gnu/packages/linux.scm | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 f; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg00756.html (11,095 bytes)
137. [PATCH 07/17] gnu: linux-libre: Use make-linux-libre. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:34:16 +0200; * gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre, linux-libre-4.4, linux-libre-4.1): Use make-linux-libre. (make-linux-libre): New variable. -- gnu/packages/linux.scm | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file change; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg00754.html (12,793 bytes)
138. [PATCH 02/17] gnu: linux-libre: Use modify-phases. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:34:11 +0200; * gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre): Use modify-phases. -- gnu/packages/linux.scm | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg00751.html (12,173 bytes)
139. [PATCH 2/5] gnu: linux-libre: Use modify-phases. (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:09:25 +0200; * gnu/packages/linux.scm (linux-libre): Use modify-phases. -- gnu/packages/linux.scm | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg00175.html (11,282 bytes)
140. Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add bind (score: 2): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:08:04 +0200; Sorry. Somehow this patch ended up with a whole lot of other stuff I didn't intend. Forget it for now. I'll send another patch for review when I've figured out what happened. J' On Mon, Aug 29, 2016; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg01942.html (28,047 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]