Hello! Nice! I’m happy to merge your changes in the ‘guix-hpc’ channel for the time being (I can create you an account there if you wish so you can create merge requests etc.). Let me know! I a
Hello, after seeing that ROCm packages [1] are available in the Guix-HPC channel, I decided to try and package PyTorch 2.2.1 with ROCm 6.0.2. For this, I first unbundled the (many) remaining dependen
[...] I think that the larger point here is that you do not get to choose who use your software and for what purpose. That is the double edges sword of free software. Putting aside LLM for a moment,
Hi, They appear to be using the archive to build LLMs: https://www.softwareheritage.org/2024/02/28/responsible-ai-with-starcoder2/ About LLM, Software Heritage made a clear statement: https://www.so
Hi, I want to stress that I am not a lawyer, but my (possiblibly outdated) understanding of what machinelearning models can and cannot do with regards to their training data, and a reading of parts
Hi, They appear to be using the archive to build LLMs: https://www.softwareheritage.org/2024/02/28/responsible-ai-with-starcoder2/ About LLM, Software Heritage made a clear statement: https://www.so
Hi, About LLM, Software Heritage made a clear statement: https://www.softwareheritage.org/2023/10/19/swh-statement-on-llm-for-code Quoting: We feel that the question is no longer whether LLMs for cod
Hi all, I would like to share my computing resources with Guix developers and users, but I don't know which option is the best. (<-- share: per gratis) I am the admin of repo.jing.rocks, which is alr
Hi there Could you please provide the contents of a config.scm file that could be used to reproduce the problem? Best :) Wojtek -- (sig_start) website: https://koszko.org/koszko.html fingerprint: E97
Hi everyone, I’m not sure where I should register this, so I’m writing here. Running system vm following the time-machine gives out segmentation fault. guix time-machine –commit=v1.3.0 – syst
Hi Maxim, [...] I agree we should take input from free software activists both within and outside the project. My experience is that the FSF may not be as active as we’d like, as evidenced by the g
Hi Ludovic, I don't feel specially qualified to discuss this issue; perhaps it'd best be left to the people the FSF to draft new guidelines / expound the GNU FSDG with these new realities? -- Thanks,
Hi, Yes, the problem is machine-learning output comes up more and more frequently. I agree we need to come up with a policy (I’m a bit torn on this and not too sure what I’d put in there.) Maybe
In that case aren't the captions the input to the model and the images the output? The training process tries to minimize the error between the correct output from the data set and the generated out
Hi Ricardo, We should ask what is the FSF's opinion about it, if they have one. I personally see trained data models as data more than code; so when their licensing allows them to be redistributed I
Hi Guix, I’d like to draw your attention to https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64945. It’s a patch that adds binary descriptors to OpenCV. These descriptors are the result of a very expensive computatio
For a more concrete example, with facial reconition in particular, many models are quite good at recognition of faces of people of predominantly white european descent, and not very good with people
I feel like, although this might (arguably) not be the case for leela-zero nor Lc0 specifically, for certain machinelearning projects, a pretrained network can affect the program’s behavior so de
Hi, Hum, I am probably not this Someone™ but here the result of my looks. :-) First, please note that the Debian thread [1] is about, Concerns to software freedom when packaging deep-learning based