guix-devel archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ powerpc: 228 ]

Total 228 documents matching your query.

121. Re: xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 08:44:54 +0200
I've been having trouble with curl on aarch64 again. Looking at this snippet from the build log: test 1477...[Verify that error codes in headers and libcurl-errors.3 are in sync] 1477: stdout FAILED:
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-12/msg00213.html (11,848 bytes)

122. Re: xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ? (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 09:19:27 +0200
I had berlin build for powerpc64le and that went without any problems. Locally I built for riscv64 and powerpc and those both built fine. I ran into an issue locally with curl on aarch64 and test 147
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-12/msg00187.html (9,926 bytes)

123. G-expressions and chroot environment? (was Re: branch master updated: gnu: Add passff.) (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2023 19:46:00 +0100
Hi, It is not a bug of ’guix show’ because ’guix show’ accesses to the fields of the package record. And Clément’s patch is an “abuse” of the G-expressions machinery. :-) Well, this is
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-11/msg00024.html (10,353 bytes)

124. Re: branch master updated: gnu: Add passff. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 02:48:09 +0000
Hi Clément, Right, it uses gexps but I think here the better and more explicit style would be to use inputs/native-inputs. Then instead of referencing directly like #$<package-variable-name> use thi
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-10/msg00262.html (6,738 bytes)

125. Re: branch master updated: gnu: Add passff. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 17:53:30 +0000
I agree about this. When I packaged passff-host locally some time ago, I saw it has a runtime dependency on python and also needs to be able to find the pass binary. I've attached the bare (unfinishe
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-10/msg00251.html (6,426 bytes)

126. Re: branch master updated: gnu: Add passff. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 17:05:11 +0200
• Gexps carry information about the packages or derivations they refer to, and these dependencies are automatically added as inputs to the build processes that use them. No it wasn't.
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-10/msg00250.html (4,842 bytes)

127. Re: branch master updated: gnu: Add passff. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 15:35:23 +0100
This passff-host package looks a bit odd to me, one thing to mention is that guix show says it has no dependencies, but I don't think that's correct: ./pre-inst-env guix show passff-host name: passff
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-10/msg00249.html (5,428 bytes)

128. Re: Cross compilation status (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 19:01:22 +0200
Am Montag, dem 18.09.2023 um 17:17 +0300 schrieb Efraim Flashner: Fine, let's add word size to point out the obvious :)
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-09/msg00435.html (6,965 bytes)

129. Re: Cross compilation status (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 17:17:51 +0300
I will note that the only big-endian architecture which we "support" is 32-bit powerpc, so we don't have to worry that much about wrong endianness. -- Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> רנשל
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-09/msg00424.html (6,611 bytes)

130. Re: Cross compilation status (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 18:19:51 +0200
Hi Mathieu, [...] The build-systems renpy, dub is listed in “refuse“ but not then in Cross-compilation KO. Is it expected? The build-system asdf is listed as refuse but appears in the list Cross-
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-09/msg00256.html (9,274 bytes)

131. Re: bug#65391: People need to report failing builds even (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 14:26:11 -0700
Hi, maybe build failures should be limited to certain platforms that can cause this treatment, such as (32-bit) x86, x86-64 and arm-64, so build failures on other platforms would not make a package r
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-08/msg00215.html (4,432 bytes)

132. Re: bug#65391: People need to report failing builds even though we have ci.guix.gnu.org for that (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 09:13:17 +0800
Yes, honestly I only look for build failures from bug reports, not from CI if i'm not doing a "request for merge" from another branch. I found the dashboard inconvenient to use, it show failures for
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-08/msg00190.html (16,478 bytes)

133. Re: 02/03: gnu: openblas: Update architectures we provide substitutes for. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 14:54:38 +0100
Thanks for investigating further. There's maybe a secondary issue here about why changing the substitutibility of a package affects it's outputs. That doesn't make much sense to me, but maybe there's
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-06/msg00021.html (11,409 bytes)

134. Re: 02/03: gnu: openblas: Update architectures we provide substitutes for. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 11:01:57 +0300
I looked into it more. First I ran on master: './pre-inst-env guix build --no-grafts --system=armhf-linux openblas -d' /gnu/store/whi4yhiw2b0c0i3n6l8s0qfcphkvbzg4-openblas-0.3.20.drv Then I locally r
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-06/msg00011.html (10,234 bytes)

135. Re: 02/03: gnu: openblas: Update architectures we provide substitutes for. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2023 20:12:48 +0100
Ok, so the documentation does mention "rebuilding", and I do see that indeed ci.guix.gnu.org doesn't build not substitutable things. Although I think it doesn't apply recursively. Take qjson, guix re
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-06/msg00008.html (8,024 bytes)

136. Re: 02/03: gnu: openblas: Update architectures we provide substitutes for. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 21:59:32 +0300
It's not that it's triggered rebuilds, but that it's triggered builds. It's also triggered builds on powerpc64le and riscv64. Before any package which had openblas as a transitive dependency wasn't b
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-06/msg00007.html (6,586 bytes)

137. Re: 02/03: gnu: openblas: Update architectures we provide substitutes for. (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 23:03:42 +0100
I've been looking at why armhf-linux substitute availability has been dropping recently, and I think this change triggered a lot of rebuilds. Could this have gone to core-updates? → guix refresh -l
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-06/msg00006.html (5,255 bytes)

138. Re: Feature branches (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 13:01:05 -0400
Hi Andreas, I like your above ideas; I'd like to add: - I'd make the team branches permanent; e.g. the 'gnome-team' branch would always exist, and get synced periodically to master (when enough built
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-05/msg00097.html (8,220 bytes)

139. Feature branches (was: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3) (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 18:33:53 +0200
Hello, indeed someone™ should update the documentation to describe the new process. Probably we should agree on one before doing that as well... In principle all big updates should go through a fea
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-05/msg00096.html (6,467 bytes)

140. Re: Core-updates merge (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 05:55:40 +0000
Dear Andreas and fellow Guix-ers, As others have said, a big thank you to you once again for leading the charge! Much appreciated! I've just submitted <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63139> which does a
/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-04/msg00393.html (8,627 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu