guix-devel archive search

201. Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add lshw. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 18:00:37 +0100

Thank you for this! I moved it to linux.scm, added a copyright line for you and changed the URLs to use HTTPS. Also did very minor tweaks to description. Pushed as 189d8422573bdcb9392dad76426ab3e9518

/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-02/msg00289.html (6,811 bytes)

202. Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add lshw. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 00:14:56 +0100

This is updated version of patch following guidelines more closely. Please ignore previous. 2017-02-07 0:13 GMT+01:00 Boskovits, Gábor <address@hidden>: * gnu/packages/lshw.scm: New file. --  gnu/p

/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-02/msg00265.html (7,111 bytes)

203. [PATCH] gnu: Add lshw. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 00:13:10 +0100

* gnu/packages/lshw.scm: New file. -- gnu/packages/lshw.scm | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gnu/packages/lshw.scm diff --git a/gnu/packages

/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-02/msg00264.html (6,032 bytes)

204. Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add lshw (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 23:32:48 +0100

I would like to get some suggestion about which category this package belongs to. 2017-02-06 18:21 GMT+01:00 Boskovits, Gábor <address@hidden>: --  gnu/packages/lshw.scm | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++

/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-02/msg00262.html (6,963 bytes)

205. [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add lshw (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 18:21:20 +0100

-- gnu/packages/lshw.scm | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gnu/packages/lshw.scm diff --git a/gnu/packages/lshw.scm b/gnu/packages/lshw.scm n

/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-02/msg00248.html (5,927 bytes)

206. [PATCH] gnu: libosinfo: Use stable URL for pci.ids. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 15:49:22 +0100

* gnu/packages/qemu.scm (libosinfo)[native-inputs]: Use a stable URL for the pci.ids file. -- gnu/packages/qemu.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-12/msg00413.html (5,164 bytes)

207. [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add libjpeg-turbo. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 21:17:06 +0100

* gnu/packages/image.scm (libjpeg-turbo): New variable. -- gnu/packages/image.scm | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/image.scm b/gnu/packa

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-11/msg01117.html (8,175 bytes)

208. Re: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.9: Update to 4.9.4. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:07:24 -0400

Most changes go to 'master' first and are later merged into 'core-updates'. However, changes that would force a large number of rebuilds need to be pushed to another branch, to allow our build farm t

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg01185.html (6,808 bytes)

209. Re: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.9: Update to 4.9.4. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:35:09 +0200

Not at all. I am not tracking core-updates, so I had missed that. I will check there in the future. Sorry about that. BTW, is there described somewhere which kind of updates go to core-updates first

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg01179.html (5,974 bytes)

210. Re: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.9: Update to 4.9.4. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:16:38 -0400

Is this different from what we have on core-updates? http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/gcc.scm?h=core-updates#n339

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg01174.html (5,392 bytes)

211. [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.9: Update to 4.9.4. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 09:51:53 +0200

gcc-4.9.3 has a bug in long double isinf builtin on PowerPC, which affects glibc versions >= 2.23. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117 * gnu/packages/gcc.scm (gcc-4.9): Update to 4.9.4

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg01171.html (6,032 bytes)

212. Re: Cross-building bootstrap binaries fail in current master (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:50:11 +0200

Hello! address@hidden (Carlos Sánchez de La Lama) skribis: As discussed on IRC, --target expect a “GNU triplet” such as “i686-linux-gnu”, so the above thing cannot work. Note that cross-buil

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg01055.html (6,819 bytes)

213. Re: [PATCH 03/15] gnu: Add chez-web. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:01:40 +0200

I spent a bunch of time trying to tangle the released WEB file and I was always getting errors (I even contacted the author). At some point I had enough and tried the latest commit and all of a sudde

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00873.html (9,734 bytes)

214. Re: [PATCH 03/15] gnu: Add chez-web. (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 03:43:08 +0100

Can you expand on this comment? Why does the released version not work? You can use %output instead of (assoc-ref %outputs "out") here. I think the description up to the first comma is enough, since

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00844.html (8,945 bytes)

215. Re: Boostrap tar cannot exec xz (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 18:06:09 +0200

address@hidden (Carlos Sánchez de La Lama) skribis: [...] Ooh, and the Tar commit Danny mentions is a post-1.27 change, which is why our other bootstrap binaries don’t have this problem, is that r

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00131.html (8,048 bytes)

216. Re: Boostrap tar cannot exec xz (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 09:22:29 +0200

Hi Ludo, It does not when extracting, but seems to do when compressing (which is what causes my bootstrapping problem). Your experiment yields similar results here: --8<--cut here--start-->8-- $ ./pr

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00112.html (9,724 bytes)

217. Re: Boostrap tar cannot exec xz (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 23:47:19 +0200

Hi! Yes, my plan is to make a full GuixSD install at some point. But step by step, first thing is bootstrapping on top of my debian. Noticed. I tried removing that substitution extra phase and tar te

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg02312.html (5,985 bytes)

218. Re: Boostrap tar cannot exec xz (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 22:08:17 +0200

Hi! address@hidden (Carlos Sánchez de La Lama) skribis: This is exciting, BTW! That substitution is needed, because otherwise ‘tar’ fails to spawn external programs when in a build environment (

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg02305.html (5,536 bytes)

219. Boostrap tar cannot exec xz (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:06:59 +0200

Hi Ludo, still trying too bootstrap linux-powerpc. I find the boostrap binary "tar" fails to execute xz (which is un turn required to build make on continue the bootstrap process), because it can not

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg02272.html (4,804 bytes)

220. Re: fgrep fails to find grep during bootstrap (score: 2)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 19:59:44 -0400

I've fixed this problem on the core-updates branch: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=core-updates&id=1063d325ea76aa2b00dfcd3d436b16e412103df1 Mark

/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg02116.html (5,469 bytes)