Hi, I've implemented this for most things now (except for the status bar at the bottom). Not sure what can be done about this. I agree - it was jarring for me as well. I agree - providing reasonable
Just checking: is the proposal that --only-substitutes /always/ prints a list of packages without substitutes? My understanding was that it would only print the list if there were packages without su
Hi Ludo, Sorry. I am migrating repositories from github and while gitlab imports even the issue trackers (cool!) it set repos to private by default. Go figure. Fixed access. But don't look at it now,
Hi Pjotr, Pjotr Prins <address@hidden> skribis: Oh. Apparently I cannot access that page without logging in. For developers, the instructions at <https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Bu
I have just wasted a few hours trying to find a way to bootstrap the latest tree. And I got it to work haphazardly - that means I can't reproduce what I did. Starting from running 'guix pull' twice a
Hi! Maxim Cournoyer <address@hidden> skribis: Oh I see. ‘guix substitute --query’ (aka. “updating list of substitutes”) correctly ignores the faulty machine, but ‘guix substitute --substitu
Hi Christopher! Christopher Baines <address@hidden> skribis: I liked it. :-) Does the SVG at <http://cbaines.net/stickers/> has anything special (like CMYK foobaring) besides stripping the name from
Hey, In summary, guix-artwork needs more stickers, and once there are some designs, maybe I can organise getting them printed. So before FOSDEM (2017) I planned to make some stickers as I had quite e
I filed a bug report: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1344493 I wonder if it would pass if we relaxed the timeout, it looks it might be a race condition (test expecting error but client
NSS 2.29.2 failed to build on armhf. This means that armhf users still do not have the most recent set of CA certificates as compiled by Mozilla and released on 2017-01-04 as NSS 3.28.1: https://wiki
Would it work to simply run this on all of "out/share/man", instead of explicitly specifying the sections? I would also use 0644 perms here, not that it matters though! Attachment: signature.asc Desc
* gnu/services/base.scm (<agetty-configuration>): New record type. (agetty-shepherd-service, agetty-service): New procedures. (agetty-service-type): New variable. * doc/guix.texi (Base Services): Doc
Ha! I just printed using GuixSD :) The way Andy described worked. We should really add this to the documentation. Related to this thread, I see if I can apply the suggested changes this week. Thank y