Hi Guix, this patch series adds the XMPP client Gajim. PGP support only works with the “classic” GnuPG (version 1.4). I had to disable a few tests in pyOpenSSL and python-gnupg. The vast majority
I've investigated a bit and have some light to shed on this issue. First, I've tested printing the value of LINUX_MODULE_DIRECTORY as suggested previously in this thread, and found it not to be a goo
The paths cupsd uses can be configured with etc/cups/cupsd.conf and etc/cups/cups-files.conf. I see that the socket listen path in the first file is incorrect; the log file paths in the latter are al
I ran it in a guile REPL (as root) and I got the first two outputs, but an error on (execl ...). It's an unhelpful message: ERROR: In procedure execl: ERROR: In procedure execl: Permission denied The
Okay, I believe I've taken all feedback into account. Everything seems to work right now, and it even compiles the files to .go files. I think that's everything (but let me know if not!) - Chris * gn
Here's a patch to add minikanren via ijp's port to r6rs packaging to Guix. It's my first Guix patch... I hope I did okay! I named it guile-minikanren which isn't really accurate. I'm not sure how els
I just created a GuixSD tee-shirt and hoodie in teespring: http://teespring.com/guixsd-for-the-libre-geek . For those who can afford it, I hope you enjoy it :) Awesome! I bought a t-shirt. I'm curiou
address@hidden skribis: The ‘sendfile’ call is made by ‘add-to-store’ (in ‘write-file’), so that would mean that the daemon process terminated or closed the connection unexpectedly. Howev
I'm currently staying at a place with a slow net connection, where it takes several hours to download texlive-20140525-texmf.tar.xz (1.74 GB). Several times in a row, the download has failed with: bu
Cyril Roelandt <address@hidden> skribis: Cool! What about just making it like this: [...] @xref{Packaging Guidelines}, for more information on how to test package definitions, and @ref{Invoking guix
Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis: [...] Eventually yes, but for now I think it may still be useful to have 4.7 around (for instance, as a developer it’s sometimes useful to test with older com
Okay. Sorry, here I meant the version numbers 4.7.3, 4.8.2 and 4.9.0. Maybe we could drop 4.7.0? So this is the one that is used for compiling all our packages? Could we then not drop the gcc-4.8.2 f
Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis: Ahah. :-) That would be too big. Plus, when you say “all”, do you really mean Ada and Java for instance? These make things definitely bigger. The default pa