guix-devel archive search

Results:

References: [ printing: 274 ]

Total 274 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [PATCH] build: pull: Compile .scm files in one process. (score: 4): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:07:35 +0100; address@hidden (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis: [...] On top of current master, it fails for me in the same way as above. To be clear, I applied the patch, ran ‘make dist’, and then: t; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-11/msg00707.html (10,591 bytes)
42. Re: [PATCH] build: pull: Compile .scm files in one process. (score: 4): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:53:28 +0100; That's one of the errors that result from a "bad" order of compiling the files and when the 'load' hack isn't used to work around it, which isn't the case in that patch... Indeed I can't seem to repr; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-11/msg00705.html (20,562 bytes)
43. Re: [PATCH] build: pull: Compile .scm files in one process. (score: 4): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 23:20:26 +0100; address@hidden (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis: Just tried this patch without the ‘thread-safe-port’ procedure, but I got this (current master): --8<--cut here--start-->8-- loading...; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-11/msg00700.html (11,025 bytes)
44. Re: [PATCH] build: pull: Compile .scm files in one process. (score: 4): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 10:54:21 +0100; Here's the output: compiling... 0.0% of 463 files compiling '/gnu/store/dbkpm8rqjz096w0bchmnlj8gw15q2riy-guix-latest/guix.scm'... ;;; Failed to autoload make-session in (gnutls): ;;; ERROR: missing i; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-11/msg00188.html (22,078 bytes)
45. Re: [PATCH] build: pull: Compile .scm files in one process. (score: 4): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 21:50:58 +0100; address@hidden (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis: Could you do ‘guix pull --verbose’ so we see the order in which files are compiled? TIA, Ludo’.; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-11/msg00179.html (9,069 bytes)
46. Re: Proposal for a blog contribution on reproducible computations (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 21:40:29 +0100; Hi Konrad, Thank you! It is very interesting!! Below questions. And suggestions which I can Pull-Request with Github. :-) Hope it is readable: indented text is your text; non-indented one is question; /archive/html/guix-devel/2020-01/msg00175.html (56,069 bytes)
47. Re: I managed to build guix natively on Debian GNU/Hurd , what's next? (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 19:27:12 +0200; OK, thanks. I have now installed the bootstrap binaries in the guix installed directory. Issuing guix build hello --keep-failed gives plenty of output, too much for the terminal buffer. It ends with:; /archive/html/guix-devel/2019-08/msg00224.html (10,241 bytes)
48. Re: having trouble modifying guix-daemon (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 18:05:34 +0200; Hello, Robert Vollmert <address@hidden> skribis: OK, I see. Fundamentally, we should treat “guix takes a while without printing anything” as a bug. I think the UI should always show a progress ba; /archive/html/guix-devel/2019-07/msg00150.html (7,428 bytes)
49. [PATCH] fix idris (was "Re: Incomplete work to upgrade Idris to 1.2.0") (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 23:19:20 -0600; On guix-devel¹, I had given an incomplete patch to update idris to 1.2.0. After further investigation, I concluded this was the wrong approach because our current version of GHC is 8.0.2, so the rig; /archive/html/guix-devel/2018-03/msg00120.html (19,917 bytes)
50. Re: Mes 0.10 released (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:15:13 +0200; .. Yes. Luckily, GCC can still handle simple C constructs ;-) When running i686-unknown-linux-tcc and mes-tcc to compile a trivial C program, the output produced by `lotsa debug printing' from both c; /archive/html/guix-devel/2017-09/msg00166.html (6,552 bytes)
51. [PATCH 5/7] gnu: Add idris-wl-pprint. (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 18:19:56 +0100; * gnu/packages/haskell.scm (idris-wl-pprint): New variable. -- gnu/packages/haskell.scm | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/haskell.scm b/gnu/pac; /archive/html/guix-devel/2017-01/msg00080.html (8,272 bytes)
52. Re: [Patch v2 3/3] gnu: Add pdfposter. (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 09:51:28 +0200; ^^^^^^^ typo ^^^^ I would leave this out -- Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> אפרים פלשנרGPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on e; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-11/msg00434.html (10,239 bytes)
53. [Patch v2 3/3] gnu: Add pdfposter. (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 23:39:13 +0100; * gnu/packages/pdf.scm(pdfposter): New variable. -- gnu/packages/pdf.scm | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/pdf.scm b/gnu/packages/pdf.sc; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-11/msg00428.html (8,825 bytes)
54. [PATCH 3/3] gnu: Add pdfposter. (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 22:37:02 +0100; * gnu/packages/pdf.scm(pdfposter): New variable. -- gnu/packages/pdf.scm | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/pdf.scm b/gnu/packages/pdf; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-11/msg00389.html (8,650 bytes)
55. [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Do not propagate inputs in haskell.scm. (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 23:22:33 +0200; Hi Ricardo, can you explain the rationale for this change? Has the GHC compiler behavior changed significantly since version 7.8.4? Nobody likes propagated-inputs, but they have a reason. *Building*; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00024.html (116,040 bytes)
56. [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Do not propagate inputs in haskell.scm. (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 17:51:09 +0200; * gnu/packages/haskell.scm (ghc-streaming-commons)[propagated-inputs]: Move ghc-random... [inputs]: ...to here; remove ghc-async, add ghc-directory, add ghc-transformers; move ghc-quickcheck, ghc-hsp; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00019.html (92,604 bytes)
57. [PATCH 02/11] gnu: python: Import guix licenses with #:prefix license:. (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:20:09 +0200; * gnu/packages/python.scm (define-module): Add import. -- gnu/packages/python.scm | 424 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 211 insertions(+), 213 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/python; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-08/msg01501.html (90,670 bytes)
58. [PATCH 2/4] gnu: Rename 'glib' label to 'glib:bin' where appropriate. (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:49:14 +0200; * gnu/packages/avahi.scm * gnu/packages/cups.scm * gnu/packages/geeqie.scm * gnu/packages/gimp.scm * gnu/packages/glib.scm * gnu/packages/gnome.scm * gnu/packages/gnucash.scm * gnu/packages/gstreamer; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-07/msg00744.html (37,814 bytes)
59. [PATCH] Haskell packages towards Pandoc. (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:14:53 +0100; Hi Guix, I wanted to package Pandoc (because it’s popular on its own and used by the popular rmarkdown R package) and went down the Haskell rabbit hole. Here’s a first collection of patches and n; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-11/msg00692.html (42,426 bytes)
60. Re: [PATCH] build: pull: Compile .scm files in one process. (score: 3): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:12:27 +0100; It seems to be (guix scripts environment) -> (gnu system linux-container) -> (gnu system) -> (gnu packages firmware) -> (gnu packages cross-base) It would be amazing if we could easily create graphs; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-11/msg00305.html (10,373 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]