guix-devel archive search

Results:

References: [ substitute: 4268 ] [ mirror: 1859 ]

Total 473 documents matching your query.

341. [PATCH] gnu: Add Icedtea 3.0.0pre09 (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:40:21 +0100; Hi Guix, the latest icedtea-ified JDK has not yet been released, but this doesn’t mean we can’t package it. Attached is a patch to add “icedtea-8” (because it provides the JDK for Java versio; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-03/msg00410.html (11,688 bytes)
342. Re: [PATCH] Update lisp.scm CCL and SBCL to latest versions (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 20:46:13 +0200; somehow they ended up inline in the email here. I can't tell exactly with the patches inline, but the commit message should be: gnu: sbcl: Update to 1.3.2. * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (sbcl): Update to 1; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-02/msg00429.html (12,529 bytes)
343. [PATCH] Update lisp.scm CCL and SBCL to latest versions (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:36:41 -0600; I don't have another machine to check for reproducibility right now, but I believe i've done everything else specified by the contributing section of the manual. Each version upgrade is a separate at; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-02/msg00393.html (10,121 bytes)
344. [PATCH] Need help with error while updating sbcl to 1.3.1 (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 16:18:50 -0600; First off, you can find my output and patch attached to this email. I am attempting to do what should be a simple patch to update sbcl in lisp.scm to the latest upstream version. I am running guix on; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-02/msg00194.html (83,493 bytes)
345. [PATCH 1/1] gnu: w3m: Update to 0.5.3+git20151119. (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:26:55 -0500; Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/16791>. * gnu/packages/w3m.scm (w3m): Update to 0.5.3+git20151119. [source]: Remove patch. [arguments]: Remove substition. * gnu/packages/patches/w3m-fix-compile.patch: Del; /archive/html/guix-devel/2016-01/msg00145.html (8,755 bytes)
346. Re: [PATCH] Add fraggenescan. (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 07:53:27 +1000; Heya, On 20/12/15 23:03, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: thanks for your patch! and thank you. +(define-public fraggenescan + (package + (name "fraggenescan") + (version "1.20") + (source + (origin + (method u; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-12/msg00780.html (14,370 bytes)
347. [PATCH 5/6] gnu: Add gnome-control-center. (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:36:18 +0800; * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome-control-center): New variable. -- gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/pack; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-12/msg00422.html (10,813 bytes)
348. [PATCHES] Add Kodi (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:35:45 -0500; This one was a real hairball, but here is a patch set that adds the Kodi media center! I hope that I've explained all the craziness relatively well in the comments. * gnu/packages/xml.scm (tinyxml):; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-11/msg00652.html (22,637 bytes)
349. Re: [PATCH 2/5] gnu: Add evolution-data-server. (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:57:37 +0300; [...] ^^ Please indent (string-append ...) clauses inside list properly. I would make it: (add-before 'check 'pre-check (lambda _ (substitute* "tests/test-server-utils/e-test-server-utils.c" but it p; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-11/msg00267.html (9,618 bytes)
350. [PATCH 4/5] gnu: Add gdm. (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:51:36 +0800; * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gdm): New variable. -- gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-11/msg00258.html (9,307 bytes)
351. [PATCH] Add BLESS (was: Re: Bioinformatics package: Bless) (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:28:23 +0100; Hi, Great! Thank you for your contribution. I have taken your recipe and removed more bundled sources in a snippet. There’s still bundled stuff that we should get rid of, most importantly kmc, whic; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-11/msg00165.html (11,089 bytes)
352. Re: [PATCH] R build system and CRAN importer (updated) (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:24:38 +0200; Hi David, that’s okay. Thank you for taking the time to review this patch set! I’m not sure this mapping is the same for CRAN as it is for others. For example, ‘string->license’ for the CPAN; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-08/msg00530.html (14,079 bytes)
353. GNU Guix 0.8.3 released (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 11:07:46 +0200; We are pleased to announce the release of GNU Guix version 0.8.3, representing 828 commits by 25 people over 2 months. • About GNU Guix is a functional package manager for the GNU system. The Guix; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-07/msg00585.html (21,016 bytes)
354. Re: GNU Guix 0.8.2 released (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 07:35:35 -0700; not sure how realistic is this on the Hurd? On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote: We are pleased to announce the release of GNU Guix version 0.8.2, representing 1,; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-05/msg00197.html (34,933 bytes)
355. GNU Guix 0.8.2 released (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 13:48:48 +0200; We are pleased to announce the release of GNU Guix version 0.8.2, representing 1,743 commits by 24 people over 3.5 months. • About GNU Guix is a functional package manager for the GNU system. The G; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-05/msg00195.html (31,234 bytes)
356. [PATCH 8/9] gnu: Add gnome-settings-daemon. (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 15:01:30 +0200; * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome-settings-daemon): New variable. -- gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/pac; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-04/msg00139.html (8,727 bytes)
357. Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add twolame. (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:42:35 +0100; So I ran it without the which input and, my bad, it's not the configure script this time but a piece of code in the test.pl script: SKIP: { my $result = system("which sndfile-convert > /dev/null"); s; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-02/msg00644.html (8,996 bytes)
358. gnu: Add CLISP. (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:48:05 +0100; * gnu/packages/lisp.scm (clisp): New variable. -- gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gnu/packa; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-02/msg00374.html (8,078 bytes)
359. Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ECL. (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:43:50 -0500; In general, it's probably better to avoid unnecessary rearrangements like this, since it will tend to cause conflicts when other people have pending patches in the same module. Our convention is to w; /archive/html/guix-devel/2015-02/msg00326.html (13,514 bytes)
360. Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add samtools (score: 14): Author: HIDDEN; Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:48:57 +0100; Attached is an updated patch. I chose to reword it as "Utilities to efficiently manipulate nucleotide sequence alignments"; is this okay? I agree. See attached patch. * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.sc; /archive/html/guix-devel/2014-12/msg00245.html (11,200 bytes)

Current List: 341 - 360
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]