bug-mailutils archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ uidl: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

1. mailutil/X-UIDL (score: 38)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:21:35 -0500 (EST)
Done. The scheme is to look for "X-UIDL" if not generate the md5 base on the message and set X-UIDL which will be save when expunging. see message.c/message_get_uidl() What were you suggesting by MD
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-01/msg00017.html (5,917 bytes)

2. [bug-mailutils] --uidl keeps downloading the same message over and over again (score: 37)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 10:37:31 +0200
Hello! I searched archives but did not find answer there: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=uidl&submit=Search%21&idxname=bug-mailutils&max=100&result=normal&sort=score I am havi
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2019-05/msg00000.html (5,933 bytes)

3. Re: [bug-mailutils] --uidl keeps downloading the same message over and over again (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 23:09:36 +0200
Thank you very much Sergey. Patched release-3.6 movemail correctly retrieves only those files missing in local mbox. George
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2019-05/msg00003.html (5,892 bytes)

4. Re: [bug-mailutils] --uidl keeps downloading the same message over and over again (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 11:53:27 +0300
Hi George, Thanks for the report. I have pushed the following fix: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/mailutils.git/patch/?id=bf87c2f6634b992252857076a5eadc6d16e9e9df Please give it a try. Notice, howe
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2019-05/msg00001.html (4,939 bytes)

5. [bug-mailutils] UIDL and POP, best way? (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:18:46 +0800
Hi, Can someone tell me why mailutils, when getting the uidl value from a POP server (message_get_uidl()) calculates a checksum from the whole message (ie. downloading the whole message) ? Also, thou
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2005-01/msg00013.html (5,439 bytes)

6. Re: diff between UIDL(POP) and UID(IMAP) (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:00:42 -0500 (EST)
Ok, so far. You are saying : - We reuse the POP3 "X-UIDL" code for the "X-UID" imap uid ? - We reuse the IMAP4 "X-UID" for the pop uidl "X-UIDL" ? I probably misunderstood either way. The code for t
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-01/msg00026.html (5,542 bytes)

7. Re: diff between UIDL(POP) and UID(IMAP) (score: 33)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:18:36 -0800 (PST)
the +number can be made to guarantee ascending. besides, mail tomorrow will have a time bigger than now.
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-01/msg00028.html (4,607 bytes)

8. RE: diff between UIDL(POP) and UID(IMAP) (score: 33)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:49:08 -0800 (PST)
POP's just needs to be unique. It is implementation specific, each pop server can do it however they want. We can use the IMAP code if we want, the key is that the code always does the same thing.
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-01/msg00023.html (4,871 bytes)

9. diff between UIDL(POP) and UID(IMAP) (score: 33)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:51:15 -0500 (EST)
Bonjour Somebody understand the difference between uid for IMAP and POP. POP3 is saying a uniq id but no word about ascending etc ... -- au revoir, alain -- Aussi haut que l'on soit assis, on n'est t
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-01/msg00018.html (4,491 bytes)

10. [bug-mailutils] address@hidden: Bug#205828: mailutils-pop3d: UIDL don't persist across sessions if QUIT is not issued (violates RFC !)] (score: 26)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:17:06 +0200
Hello, I got another interesting bug report on Debian. Package: mailutils-pop3d Version: 20030809-2 Severity: important The package mailutils-pop3d suffers from a bug in its UIDL management, as evide
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2003-08/msg00039.html (9,357 bytes)

11. Re: [bug-mailutils] address@hidden: Bug#205828: mailutils-pop3d: UIDL don't persist across sessions if QUIT is not issued (violates RFC !)] (score: 17)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:30:41 +0300
Thanks. Will be fixed. Regards, Sergey
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2003-08/msg00040.html (4,971 bytes)

12. bugs and propositions for pop3d (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 20:42:27 +0300 (EET DST)
Hello, I am trying to test pop3d from mailutils in real production environment. The system is GNU/Linux with 2.2.6 kernel. While configuring/building I have discovered some bugs. Further, in the cour
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-04/msg00027.html (62,116 bytes)

13. Re: [bug-mailutils] Compiling mailutils 2.0 on solaris (score: 6)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:40:43 +0300
Hi Maarten, OK, I'll need to provide a substitute, then. OK, so what version of Guile you have now? Ouch! That's unfortunate. Sure. Please, try the attached patch. Regards, Sergey diff --git a/config
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2009-07/msg00000.html (105,423 bytes)

14. Re: [bug-mailutils] figuring out mailuils... (score: 4)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:10:32 +0300
Hi Alfred, Sergey Poznyakoff <address@hidden> ha escrit: I have implemented the mu_mailbox_get_uidls function, which returns a list of message numbers with the corresponding UIDLs. It is pretty effec
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2009-07/msg00017.html (4,976 bytes)

15. Re: mailutils/IMAP (2) (score: 4)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 00:42:26 -0500 (EST)
Ok. But there is a certain danger the way it is now. Suppose I set the number to of daemon to 5 after 5 connections all new connections will backlog(listen()) and finally rejected. This is intention
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-01/msg00013.html (8,163 bytes)

16. Re: mailutils/IMAP (2) (score: 4)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: 10 Jan 2001 21:17:22 -0800
It should be good, provided it is coded right. The only reason 0.9.8 and below preforked is because I was having problems creating proper fork-on-demand code. I was able to create some rather elegant
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-01/msg00012.html (7,396 bytes)

17. Re: [bug-mailutils] movemail: downloads again messages that are available (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 16:05:59 +0200
Jean Louis <address@hidden> ha escrit: Please use the --uidl option. From `movemail --help': -u, --uidl use UIDLs to avoid downloading the same message twice Please see http://mailutils.org/wiki/Fetc
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2016-12/msg00003.html (4,807 bytes)

18. [bug-mailutils] Segmentation Fault in gnu-mh part of mailutils (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 01:13:39 +0900
Sergy, I reported that the patch you made worked. But apparently it doesn't. I didn't test it well enough. The problem was that a ISP still uses old mail handingle and the newer something (see the pa
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2013-06/msg00000.html (10,258 bytes)

19. [bug-mailutils] GNU mailutils-2.1 released (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:35:48 +0300
Hello, The GNU Mailutils team is pleased to announce the release of GNU Mailutils Version 2.1. This release marks the 10th anniversary of the project. See below for a list of user-visible changes sin
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2009-09/msg00000.html (13,571 bytes)

20. [bug-mailutils] mailutils-2.0.90 (alpha) released (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:55:32 +0300
Hello, The GNU Mailutils team is pleased to announce the release of Mailutils 2.0.90. This is an alpha version. See below for a list of user-visible changes. Here are the compressed sources: ftp://al
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2009-08/msg00016.html (10,968 bytes)

21. additional changes (was Re: POP3d locking) (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 00:56:01 -0400 (EDT)
Bonjour Absolutely! patch in. Ok, patch in. Do not see why: == pop3d.c == int pop3d_mainloop (int infile, int outfile) { int status = OK; ifile = infile; ofile = fdopen (outfile, "w"); if (ofile == N
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-04/msg00063.html (6,128 bytes)

22. Re: POP3d locking (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 12:45:14 +0300
Hello, I have finished the locking version of pop3d. The version has been working on my mail server since thursday and behaves itself well. I have followed the basic guidelines we have discussed, exc
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-04/msg00060.html (23,970 bytes)

23. Re: mailutils/IMAP (2) (score: 3)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 23:57:43 -0500 (EST)
Second try. Done, it turns out that I did not have much to change. I noticed that you no longer use the "preforked" scheme use in the 0.9.8. I do not know if it's good or bad(think it's good) since
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-01/msg00011.html (7,078 bytes)

24. Re: [bug-mailutils] mh strange behaviour (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 11:49:45 +0200
Hello Sergey, Thank you for your answer and all the work done on mailutils. It's a great piece of software, which is, as far as I can judge, quite well thought. I have discovered two others little th
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2017-05/msg00002.html (7,742 bytes)

25. Re: [bug-mailutils] mh strange behaviour (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 00:36:50 -2100
Hi Pierre-Jean, To begin with, thanks a lot for a detailed report. I appreciate immensely the extracts from your configuration files, that help so much to clarify the picture. Judging by your configu
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2017-05/msg00001.html (7,025 bytes)

26. Re: [bug-mailutils] movemail: needs more verbosity (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:44:08 +0200
Jean Louis <address@hidden> ha escrit: Please try the attached patch. It implements the -m (--progress-meter) option for movemail, which does what you proposed. The patch is against the recent stable
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2017-03/msg00007.html (13,583 bytes)

27. [bug-mailutils] movemail 3.1, hanging again (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:20:30 +0300
Hello Sergey, I have immediately unpacked and tried the mailtuils 3.1, by thinking movemail would get all the improvements from last days, but it is hanging again. I have tried using the patch, but i
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2016-12/msg00017.html (6,314 bytes)

28. Re: [bug-mailutils] figuring out mailuils... (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:24:49 -0400
That's true, the POP3 protocol contains the `UIDL' command which translates message numbers to their UIDLs. Unfortunately there is no way to use it directly in libmailutils. Allow me some time to fi
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2009-06/msg00001.html (4,656 bytes)

29. Re: [bug-mailutils] figuring out mailuils... (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:48:45 +0300
Alfred M. Szmidt <address@hidden> ha escrit: That's true, the POP3 protocol contains the `UIDL' command which translates message numbers to their UIDLs. Unfortunately there is no way to use it direct
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2009-05/msg00021.html (5,045 bytes)

30. Re: [bug-mailutils] figuring out mailuils... (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:58:19 +0300
Alfred M. Szmidt <address@hidden> ha escrit: Yes, that's true. The docs leave a lot to be desired. No, it does not. It only returns a message, as its name suggests, nothing more. Another important th
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2009-05/msg00007.html (6,451 bytes)

31. [bug-mailutils] figuring out mailuils... (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 03:33:12 -0400
I'm trying to add some more error checking, and general paranoid behaviour to movemail, but I am not even sure where to begin to add this... I am finding the documentation a bit lacking over what eac
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2009-05/msg00005.html (4,960 bytes)

32. Re: [bug-mailutils] pop3d sanity check (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:43:35 -0400
To fix this, do the following: 1. Start pop3d on the usual port (110): /usr/sbin/pop3d -d --tls-required --ssl-cert=/etc/ca-cert.pem \ --ssl-key=/etc/ca-key.pem 2. Use fetchmail's tls1 option: poll m
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2008-07/msg00002.html (6,538 bytes)

33. Re: [bug-mailutils] Error in redirect sieve action [SOLVED] (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 12:49:08 +0300
Thanks for answering. I can definitely use your help. I believe I caused some confusion with my writings. This is what a mail item in my Maildir (cur subdirectory) looks like: == Example mail item ==
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2005-07/msg00004.html (10,075 bytes)

34. Re: [bug-mailutils] Problem with timeout interaction (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:54:10 -0400 (EDT)
Yes, I like that. You forgot: - to change code in retr.c, it should not check for attribute_is_deleted. - also I'm not sure we should set read, attribute_set_read when the message is downloaded(via
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2003-10/msg00021.html (12,364 bytes)

35. Re: [bug-mailutils] Problem with timeout interaction (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:09:51 -0400 (EDT)
Yes, this is troubling, scenario: Work: via your mail client you mark this for deletion by do not expunge,(Mutt can do this, I think) Home: start a POP3 session, to download an important email, quit
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2003-10/msg00017.html (8,398 bytes)

36. Re: [bug-mailutils] Problem with timeout interaction (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 08:52:29 -0400
Yuck. Oy. That's a bit of a crazy interpretation, though isn't it? I guess the user could always issue RSET at the beginning of a session, but I've always assumed that abnormal termination would gene
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2003-10/msg00013.html (7,928 bytes)

37. Re: [bug-mailutils] Problem with timeout interaction (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 12:05:30 +0300
Hi Jeff, No, that would break the UIDL functionality: RFC1939, Section 7, Page 11: The unique-id of a message is an arbitrary server-determined string, consisting of one to 70 characters in the range
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2003-10/msg00012.html (7,040 bytes)

38. filling "To" is still broken... (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:55:40 +0200
I am using the cvs version (2002-09-30) of mailutils and the "mail" program from it. When replying to the message with header: Return-Path: <address@hidden> Received: from leo.dbs.uni-hannover.de [13
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2002-10/msg00000.html (6,216 bytes)

39. Re: Busy looping on my IMAP server... (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 20:50:05 -0400 (EDT)
Send me the message. imap_token() should have advance the string on each iterations. Later.
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-10/msg00020.html (6,676 bytes)

40. Busy looping on my IMAP server... (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 19:38:58 -0400
Bon soir! I have to read the code, to see what is supposed to happen, but does anybody with a knowledge of IMAP have a comment on how I might get to: ~/s/mailutils/examples $ make mbox-explode && mbo
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-10/msg00019.html (5,950 bytes)

41. RFC (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 21:06:55 +0530
Hi , I am facing a problem, when trying to retrieve mails from some service providers, the uidl that we get from other service providers contains a characters like !<>? etc. Are these supported in th
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-07/msg00070.html (4,255 bytes)

42. Re: Breaking mailutils to pieces (score: 2)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 18:06:27 -0400
Looking through my mailboxes, it looks as if fetchmail is also doing this when after it pulls mail from my pop server, and before it pushes into sendmail for local delivery. I believe it is compliant
/archive/html/bug-mailutils/2001-05/msg00061.html (7,962 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu