bug-wget archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ warc: 295 ]

Total 295 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Bug-wget] Question on WARC (score: 37)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:34:30 +0200
Hi Gisle, I guess you misunderstood the purpose of WARC. It is for archiving web sites/content, but not used for caching by Wget. It may have some kind of academical use, not sure what people *really
/archive/html/bug-wget/2014-07/msg00056.html (5,407 bytes)

42. Re: [Bug-wget] Standards fix for metadata records in WARC files (score: 37)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 14:23:53 +0200
Thanks, pushed! Just a curiosity, how did you generate the patch? I had some problems to apply it with "git am". -- Giuseppe
/archive/html/bug-wget/2013-04/msg00033.html (5,525 bytes)

43. [Bug-wget] wget 1.14 possibly writing off-spec warc.gz files (score: 37)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:33:33 +0000 (UTC)
When using wget 1.14 to generate warc.gz files, e.g. wget -O tempname --warc-file="output" "http://example.com" the files this creates do not play back well using the Internet Archives warc.gz parser
/archive/html/bug-wget/2013-03/msg00079.html (5,333 bytes)

44. Re: [Bug-wget] Two fixes: Memory leak with chunked responses / Chunked responses and WARC files (score: 37)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:09:55 +0100
hey, thanks for your patches. I have pushed them. Cheers, Giuseppe
/archive/html/bug-wget/2012-01/msg00057.html (5,685 bytes)

45. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 37)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:59:33 +0200
Yes, most changes are necessary. For example, I added a method to add a WARC header that was missing; I changed the WARC version; I changed the handling of file size limits et cetera. Gijs
/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-08/msg00030.html (5,159 bytes)

46. [Bug-wget] [bug #49226] Add possibility to append to existing WARC file (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 21:44:06 +0000 (UTC)
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #49226 (project wget): I'm new to the wget community, and I'm starting to contribute and would like to work on this bug, so here are a few things I understand - As of I can
/archive/html/bug-wget/2016-12/msg00019.html (5,585 bytes)

47. [Bug-wget] [bug #49226] Add possibility to append to existing WARC file (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 19:40:38 +0000 (UTC)
URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49226> Summary: Add possibility to append to existing WARC file Project: GNU Wget Submitted by: None Submitted on: Thu 29 Sep 2016 07:40:36 PM UTC Category: Featur
/archive/html/bug-wget/2016-09/msg00162.html (5,766 bytes)

48. Re: [Bug-wget] [patch] uuid generation in warc.c (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 14:28:03 +0100
I would prefer dynamic linking (-lrpcrt4). If rpcrt4.lib/.dll is *not* a basic windows library, you should check for the library in configure.ac (case "$host_os" in ...). There is an example check: d
/archive/html/bug-wget/2015-01/msg00018.html (7,339 bytes)

49. Re: [Bug-wget] [patch] uuid generation in warc.c (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 16:40:15 +0000
And for Windows? I guess the 'UuidCreate()' or 'UuidCreateSequential()' functions from Rpcrt4.dll could be used? I could write a patch for loading Rpcrt4.dll at run-time if there's some interest. Do
/archive/html/bug-wget/2015-01/msg00015.html (6,214 bytes)

50. [Bug-wget] Question on WARC (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:13:29 +0200
Hello list. I have been toying around with the '--warc-*' options in Wget. And it seems to work like a charm with my MingW/Win-XP version. But the question I'm left with is; it's nothing that tells m
/archive/html/bug-wget/2014-07/msg00054.html (4,768 bytes)

51. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output not saved to dir specified by directory prefix (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 12:34:22 +0100
'--directory-prefix=PREFIX' Set directory prefix to PREFIX. The "directory prefix" is the directory where all other files and subdirectories will be saved to, i.e. the top of the retrieval tree. The
/archive/html/bug-wget/2014-02/msg00002.html (5,410 bytes)

52. Re: [Bug-wget] Remaining reference to opt.post_data (WARC in src/http.c) (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:27:04 +0530
Thanks Gijs! Guess I missed that line there. Also, this does mean that we need better tests especially for Warc file writing. -- Thanking You, Darshit Shah Research Lead, Code Innovation Kill Code Ph
/archive/html/bug-wget/2013-04/msg00053.html (5,535 bytes)

53. Re: [Bug-wget] Fix: Large files in WARC (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:05:11 +0100
Thanks, pushed! Giuseppe
/archive/html/bug-wget/2012-02/msg00005.html (4,869 bytes)

54. Re: [Bug-wget] Fix: Large files in WARC (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:38:42 +0100
You would also need but that seems already handled by configure. I'm not sure if that would work for 32bit Windows, though.
/archive/html/bug-wget/2012-02/msg00004.html (5,006 bytes)

55. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC, new version (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 09:39:13 -0400
What is WARC ? What is WARC used for ? Windows or 'nix ? What are its benefits, etc ? -- Dave Multi-AV Scanning Tool - http://multi-av.thespykiller.co.uk http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-10/msg00046.html (5,315 bytes)

56. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC, new version (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 19:42:26 +0200
WOW great work! It is much better now. I wonder if it is possible to remove the dependency from libuuid, maybe provide replacement for uuid_generate and uuid_unparse when libuuid is not found? Even a
/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-10/msg00040.html (6,494 bytes)

57. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 21:51:31 +0200
Hi Giuseppe and Ángel, Thanks for looking at the patch. Yes, it's quite big. (I should mention that this was also not my intention to have this complete patch added into the wget repository; it is a
/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-10/msg00020.html (6,039 bytes)

58. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 21:10:28 +0200
Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: the patch is huge and I think we don't want to add some many files into the wget tree. Can't we assume the user will install the warc tools by herself and let configure check
/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-10/msg00019.html (5,324 bytes)

59. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:20:03 +0200
not something we want to rewrite :-) do they influence the way wget+warc works? that is great, only code which is going into wget has to follow GNU standards. Other libraries can have any style, unti
/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-08/msg00029.html (5,245 bytes)

60. Re: block digest on warc revisit records (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 13:51:33 +0000
Hi gang, I did not see a reaction to this. Could a kind soul please briefly enlighten me about the status of the WARC support? -- Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel skype:thomaskr
/archive/html/bug-wget/2020-07/msg00021.html (4,338 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu