bug-wget archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ warc: 295 ]

Total 295 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [Bug-wget] [patch] uuid generation in warc.c (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 18:25:08 +0200
Do we still want to support the older Windows NT4 and 9X versions? If so, we should try loading Rpcrt4.dll dynamically, with LoadLibrary, and if that fails, fall back on the current code. Thanks.
/archive/html/bug-wget/2015-01/msg00020.html (6,366 bytes)

62. Re: [Bug-wget] Question on WARC (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:32:10 +0200
Or have I misunderstood the purpose of WARC in Wget? The Wget docs on it seems rather limited. Seems I have; the warc-file gets overwritten each time Wget runs. I assumed the file(s) should be rotate
/archive/html/bug-wget/2014-07/msg00055.html (4,612 bytes)

63. [Bug-wget] WARC output not saved to dir specified by directory prefix (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:20:16 -0800
Hello, I'm using this wget 1.15 compiled with MinGW: http://sourceforge.net/projects/getgnuwin32/. I'm noticing that when I use the --warc-file parameter in combination with the --directory-prefix pa
/archive/html/bug-wget/2014-01/msg00072.html (4,739 bytes)

64. Re: [Bug-wget] Discussion for [PATCH] Removing WARC issue in Win32 (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 21:31:13 +0200
thanks for your patch, I have just applied and pushed it. -- Giuseppe
/archive/html/bug-wget/2013-06/msg00007.html (4,749 bytes)

65. [Bug-wget] Discussion for [PATCH] Removing WARC issue in Win32 (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 20:48:46 +0300
Greetings all. Please leave Your's suggestion, commentaries or anything other about this variant of patch to SUBJ. * Solves - if try to create WARC file in Win32, then Wget fail with message "Could n
/archive/html/bug-wget/2013-05/msg00101.html (5,685 bytes)

66. Re: [Bug-wget] Remaining reference to opt.post_data (WARC in src/http.c) (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:55:45 +0200
thanks, I have just pushed it. -- Giuseppe
/archive/html/bug-wget/2013-04/msg00050.html (5,129 bytes)

67. [Bug-wget] Remaining reference to opt.post_data (WARC in src/http.c) (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:48:08 +0200
Hi, For the new --body-data option most of the code that used to reference opt.post_data has been changed to use opt.body_data. I found one remaining reference, hidden in one of the WARC-writing sect
/archive/html/bug-wget/2013-04/msg00049.html (5,323 bytes)

68. Re: [Bug-wget] wget1.14: warc.c: compilation fails due to C++ comments (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:05:17 +0200
Am Wednesday 17 April 2013 schrieb Giuseppe Scrivano: As I understood, Wget 1.14 aims to be c89/c90 compatible ? If yes, is there any interest to get these issues fixed ? warc.c:160:3: warning: ISO C
/archive/html/bug-wget/2013-04/msg00048.html (5,724 bytes)

69. Re: [Bug-wget] wget 1.14 possibly writing off-spec warc.gz files (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 21:06:12 +0200
thanks for the patch, I have just pushed it. Giuseppe
/archive/html/bug-wget/2013-04/msg00007.html (4,470 bytes)

70. Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] Invalid Content-Length header in WARC files, on some platforms (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:06:19 +0100
ops I missed it, thanks for the patch! I am going to push your patch. Giuseppe
/archive/html/bug-wget/2012-11/msg00066.html (9,255 bytes)

71. Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] Invalid Content-Length header in WARC files, on some platforms (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:07:47 +0100
Good to see that that's fixed. However, there's another instance of this problem in the warc_write_cdx_record function in warc.c. (I saw that Tim Ruehsen fixed this in his version of the patch.) The
/archive/html/bug-wget/2012-11/msg00064.html (9,750 bytes)

72. Re: [Bug-wget] Invalid Content-Length header in WARC files, on some platforms (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:11:31 +0100
Am Tuesday 13 November 2012 schrieb David Ryskalczyk: One correct possibility would be casting ftello() to long long or maxint_t (or to another at least 64 bit int ) and use %lld / %jd. I tend to use
/archive/html/bug-wget/2012-11/msg00030.html (8,744 bytes)

73. Re: [Bug-wget] Invalid Content-Length header in WARC files, on some platforms (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:17:31 -0500
I found the bug in the first place after using wget in WARC mode on ARM and PPC systems and having trouble extracting the files. I believe the issue stems from this line in warc.c: if (! asprintf (&c
/archive/html/bug-wget/2012-11/msg00027.html (7,674 bytes)

74. Re: [Bug-wget] WARC output (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:29:35 +0200
Hi Gijs, the patch is huge and I think we don't want to add some many files into the wget tree. Can't we assume the user will install the warc tools by herself and let configure check if they are ins
/archive/html/bug-wget/2011-10/msg00018.html (5,073 bytes)

75. Re: [Bug-wget] [patch] uuid generation in warc.c (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:37:59 +0100
I went ahead and pushed the patch. Thanks, Giuseppe
/archive/html/bug-wget/2015-02/msg00059.html (6,897 bytes)

76. Re: [Bug-wget] [patch] uuid generation in warc.c (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:39:17 +0100
I didn't mean it, but yes, that would be the best solution. Eli Zaretskii already already stated that. IMO, best place would be in warc_init(). That would avoid loading the library if the user does n
/archive/html/bug-wget/2015-01/msg00025.html (5,987 bytes)

77. Re: [Bug-wget] [patch] uuid generation in warc.c (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:37:08 +0100
Thanks, your patch has been pushed to git. On top of it I created the attached patch that implements my suggestion from above. Please review and test on OpenBSD if possible. Tim Attachment: 0001-conf
/archive/html/bug-wget/2014-12/msg00088.html (8,838 bytes)

78. Re: [Bug-wget] [patch] uuid generation in warc.c (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:47:36 +0100
Thanks for looking at it! I think this makes sense and would be a nice addition on any OS that provides those uuid functions natively. Given the following points: - I didn't sign the FSF paperwork th
/archive/html/bug-wget/2014-12/msg00083.html (7,759 bytes)

79. Re: [Bug-wget] [patch] uuid generation in warc.c (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:38:35 +0100
Thanks for your contribution ! It looks like a good opportunity to fix ./configure's libuuid detection. We just have to agree on an approach. Suggestion: if --with-libuuid explicitly specified search
/archive/html/bug-wget/2014-12/msg00082.html (6,704 bytes)

80. Re: [Bug-wget] Question on WARC (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 23:29:14 +0200
It may have some kind of academical use, not sure what people *really* are use this format for. Here you can find links to more detailed information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_ARChive Tim arch
/archive/html/bug-wget/2014-07/msg00057.html (4,989 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu