[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Accessibility] resident evil
From: |
Chris Hofstader |
Subject: |
Re: [Accessibility] resident evil |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Aug 2010 13:37:34 -0400 |
Will, Thanks for this. Can you please join our speech recognition list
(address@hidden with subscribe in the subject line)? We hope to get this going
really soon as we've a number of volunteers who are all chomping at the bit to
get going.
cdh
On Aug 1, 2010, at 3:14 AM, Will Pearson wrote:
> CDH:
>> We already know we will have multiple UI to serve different use cases:
>> programming by voice, dictation, command and control, etc. I think that it
>> is at the UI level where we may include features that apply more strongly to
>> someone who cannot type versus someone who prefers dictation while typing a
>> little.
>
> WXP:
> It might be an idea to change the interaction structure too. I can forsee
> different user groups being prepared to put up with different costs depending
> on what they get out of voice recognition. For example, different user
> groups will be willing to spend different amounts of time learning how to use
> the system. It would probably be useful to run the UI design process using a
> user centered design methodology.
>
>> cdh: A large bunch of the continuous dictation users who want to make emails
>> and documents and the like only want to dictate the body of the text and use
>> the keyboard to edit, format, execute commands, use menus, etc. A person who
>> cannot type must be able to do these sorts of tasks with speech and we
>> should do some sort of UI survey to design an efficient way to do these kind
>> of things.
>
> WXP:
> There's probably a few techniques that would produce a good design. One
> would be taking an engineering approach involving cognitive modelling.
> Obviously, you probably would want to run a set of thinking aloud sessions to
> validate any design - although running a thinking aloud session for a voice
> recognition system might be a bit interesting :).
>
> CDH:
>> as a blind user with RSI, I can say that while using DNS, saying, "Go back
>> four words..." pretty well really sucks if you lose count of how many words
>> you have typed since the item that you want to change. It's a strange
>> cognitive model to be composing text while also trying to count words and
>> characters that I never quite figured out how to do without spending a bunch
>> of time.
>
> WXP:
> Ouch... That must hurt. The process of sub-vocal rehersal that is used
> during short term / working memory and speech production both use Wernicke's
> Area and Broca's Area in the brain. This conflict over the use of
> neurological functions is probably dragging down your performance in both
> memory and speech production. So, it's probably a high priority thing to try
> and sort out in any future system. Not only that, it seems an interesting
> challenge and you're a friend.
>
> CDH:
>> Other than patting my dog, there is little else for a blink to do in a
>> marathon ride, sleep, ride, repeat...
>
> WXP:
> Awww. Say hi to the X-Dog from me.
>
> Will
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accessibility mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility