[Acl-devel] Default acl not respected when copying

[f0rhum]

Hi
Feel free to discard/delete this post if you think it is noise.
acl 2.2.52
coreutils 8.21
kernel 3.13
local umask 0002, ssh umask 0022
mount point -t ext4 -o defaults
# tune2fs -l /dev/sdc2|grep acl
Default mount options:    user_xattr acl


Having acl automatic inheritance working OK on mkdir & touch, I meet the 
behaviour in title. I read the related posix draft (headache) and also papers 
and slides from Andreas (mans, rich-alc ...), maybe my poor english is not 
enough. First I posted help/info requests in debian/ubuntu/coreutils.gnu.org 
forums/mailing lists with no success.
Case:
~ ls -ld /srv
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 oct.   7 16:58 /srv
~ getfacl -t /srv/test/
getfacl : remove first /...
# file: srv/test/
USER   mee              rwx  rwx
user   reader           r-x  r-x
GROUP  writers          rwx  rwx
group  reader           r-x  r-x
group  writers          rwx  rwx
mask                    rwx  rwx
other                   ---  ---

~ cp -r /media/mee/USPEED/dir/ /srv/test (fat32 source, no acl there, no cp 
alias)
~ getfacl -Rt /srv/test/
getfacl : remove first /...
# file: srv/test/ (OK, same as yet shown above)
USER   mee              rwx  rwx
user   reader           r-x  r-x
GROUP  writers          rwx  rwx
group  reader           r-x  r-x
group  writers          rwx  rwx
mask                    rwx  rwx
other                   ---  ---

# file: srv/test//dir
USER   mee              rwx  rwx
user   reader           R-X  r-x  (rx lost)
GROUP  writers          RWX  rwx  (all lost)
group  reader           R-X  r-x  (rx lost)
group  writers          RWX  rwx  (all lost)
mask                    ---  rwx  (effective is lost?)
other                   ---  ---

# file: srv/test//dir/file
USER   mee              rw-    
user   reader           r-X  (all lost (can't traverse dir))
GROUP  writers          rWX  (all lost (can't traverse dir))
group  reader           r-X  (all lost (can't traverse dir))
group  writers          rWX  (all lost (can't traverse dir))
mask                    r--  (write lost)
other                   ---

Please, should I submit a bug or do I misunderstand something?

Thank you