Re: [Acl-devel] typo in acl_get_perm?

[Mike Frysinger]

On 26 Dec 2015 16:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 26 15:46, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> > 2015-12-26 14:34 GMT+01:00 Corinna Vinschen <address@hidden>:
> > > On Dec 26 11:57, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> > >> 2015-12-25 15:36 GMT+01:00 Corinna Vinschen <address@hidden>:
> > > [...]
> > > The man page doesn't make it clear that only a single permission bit is
> > > allowed as input.
> > 
> > "The [...] function tests if the permission [...] is contained in the
> > [...] set."
> > 
> > So again, what's unclear about that?
> 
> Not trying to put too fine a point on it, but isn't the fact that I
> misunderstood an indicator that, perhaps, more than a single person
> might misunderstand it?  I'm not the only dumb person out there ;)

he asked what's unclear in the quoted statement.  what's unclear about that ? ;)
-mike

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature