Re: [Acl-devel] libattr 2.4.48 change in syscalls.c breaks fakechroot

[Andreas Grünbacher]

Am Do., 16. Aug. 2018 um 03:22 Uhr schrieb Filipe Brandenburger
<address@hidden>:
> Having said that, I really think it wouldn't hurt for libattr to
> continue providing these compatibility symbols having them implemented
> to do the syscalls themselves, using essentially the same code as
> pre-commit v2.4.48~17. There's really no downside to that, since the
> symbols are just there for compatibility anyways... That would prevent
> all these issues with LD_PRELOAD and it doesn't seem to me like that
> would be painful to maintain on libattr itself... Would you consider
> going back to using syscalls?

Yes, I think that would be okay.

Thanks,
Andreas