[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present.
From: |
Chris Frey |
Subject: |
Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present. |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:06:11 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:04:46PM +0200, Kai Sterker wrote:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval
>
> Not sure if the .la files are even used. But not sure either if
> libtool can be convinced to not generate them. OTOH, there's the CMake
> build that already compiles stuff without creating them. It might have
> problems of its own, however. Haven't tested it in a long time, so it
> could fail to build properly with newer versions of CMake either.
It's more of a binary package thing. I find it hard to convince
autotools stuff to do things the non-GNU way. It's probably easier
to do an 'rm' after 'make install'.
- Chris
- [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present., shirish शिरीष, 2011/07/05
- Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present., shirish शिरीष, 2011/07/05
- Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present., Kai Sterker, 2011/07/05
- Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present., shirish शिरीष, 2011/07/05
- Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present., Kai Sterker, 2011/07/06
- Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present.,
Chris Frey <=
- Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present., shirish शिरीष, 2011/07/08
- Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present., Kai Sterker, 2011/07/07
- Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present., Chris Frey, 2011/07/08
- Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present., Kai Sterker, 2011/07/10
- Re: [Adonthell-general] libltdl missing but libtool is present., shirish शिरीष, 2011/07/11