aramorph-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Aramorph-users] trouble with retrieving glosses


From: Pierrick Brihaye
Subject: Re: [Aramorph-users] trouble with retrieving glosses
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:17:39 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)

Hi,

Nitin Motwani a écrit :
One more thing that I forgot to mention was that this code works for other
words which such as تلفزيون (romanized to television) and ميتشل (Mitchell)
but doesn't work for california (what I mentioned last time).

Running Aramorph with a test file containing كاليفورنيا gives this results (sorry arabic characters are lost since I was too lazy to change my console encoding) :

Initializing in-memory dictionary handler...
Loading dictionary : dictPrefixes .
78 entries totalizing 299 forms
Loading dictionary : dictStems ........................................................................................................................................
38600 lemmas and 47261 entries totalizing 82158 forms
Loading dictionary : dictSuffixes ..
206 entries totalizing 618 forms
Loading compatibility table : tableAB ...
1648 entries
Loading compatibility table : tableAC .
598 entries
Loading compatibility table : tableBC ..
1285 entries
... done.
Initializing in-memory solutions handler...
... done.
Processing token :      ??????????
Transliteration :       kAlyfwrnyA

SOLUTION #5
Lemma  :        kAliyfuwroniyA
Vocalized as :  kAliyfuwroniyA
Morphology :
        prefix : Pref-0
        stem : N0
        suffix : Suff-0
Grammatical category :
        stem : kAliyfuwroniyA   NOUN_PROP
Glossed as :
        stem : California


SOLUTION #3
Lemma  :        kAliyfuwroniy~
Vocalized as :  kAliyfuwroniy~AF
Morphology :
        prefix : Pref-0
        stem : Nall
        suffix : NSuff-AF
Grammatical category :
        stem : kAliyfuwroniy~   ADJ
        suffix : AF     NSUFF_MASC_SG_ACC_INDEF
Glossed as :
        stem : Californian
        suffix : [acc.indef.]


SOLUTION #1
Lemma  :        kAliyfuwroniy~
Vocalized as :  kAliyfuwroniy~AF
Morphology :
        prefix : Pref-0
        stem : Nall
        suffix : NSuff-AF
Grammatical category :
        stem : kAliyfuwroniy~   NOUN
        suffix : AF     NSUFF_MASC_SG_ACC_INDEF
Glossed as :
        stem : Californian
        suffix : [acc.indef.]


SOLUTION #2
Lemma  :        kAliyfuwroniy~
Vocalized as :  kAliyfuwroniy~A
Morphology :
        prefix : Pref-0
        stem : Nall
        suffix : NSuff-Ah
Grammatical category :
        stem : kAliyfuwroniy~   NOUN
        suffix : A      NSUFF_MASC_DU_NOM_POSS
Glossed as :
        stem : Californian
        suffix : two


SOLUTION #4
Lemma  :        kAliyfuwroniy~
Vocalized as :  kAliyfuwroniy~A
Morphology :
        prefix : Pref-0
        stem : Nall
        suffix : NSuff-Ah
Grammatical category :
        stem : kAliyfuwroniy~   ADJ
        suffix : A      NSUFF_MASC_DU_NOM_POSS
Glossed as :
        stem : Californian
        suffix : two


=================== Statistics ===================
Lines : 1
Arabic tokens : 1
Non-arabic tokens : 0
Words found : 1 (100%)
Words not found : 0 (0%)
==================================================

Every gloss looks OK. That's why I wonder if your code isn't involved. Could you recheck ?

Cheers,

p.b.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]