[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] auctex-devel Digest, Vol 103, Issue 2

From: Mads Jensen
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] auctex-devel Digest, Vol 103, Issue 2
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:59:12 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0

On 2013-11-04 18:00, address@hidden wrote:
> Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> writes:
>> > Well, my argument is that if we add completion for macros that are
>> > seldomly used, then completion doesn't serve discoverability anymore.
> That should not be a criterion for being less helpful.  It might be an
> argument to divide stuff into two classes, like file completion does:
> you can still complete on ignored files if your prefix rules out any
> non-ignored file.

I like the idea about having some variable to discard some macros from
the completion.

>> > Just one more macro, no.  But if we add the missing, less frequently
>> > used macros, so that every style is complete, then my discoverability
>> > argument makes sense, no?
> See above.

Does somebody want to commit my patch? I'm not really sure if an average
user will ever use \DeclareGraphicsRule, so somebody makes the executive
Med Venlig Hilsen / Kind Regards,
Mads Jensen
If I find in myself desires which nothing in this world can satisfy, the
only logical explanation is that I was made for another world.
-- C.S. Lewis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]